Terah’s Journey – Genesis 11:31

Prof.

Emanuel Tov

Prof.

Emanuel Tov

Categories:

Noach

Biblical Criticism

Abram’s father Terah leaves his hometown, heading for Canaan, but ends up in Ḥaran.^[1] There are several differences (bolded) between the biblical text versions:

LXX	MT and Peshitta		Samaritan Pentateuch
^{Gen 11:31} καὶ ἔλαβεν Θαρα τὸν Αβραμ υἱὸν αὐτοῦ καὶ τὸν Λωτ υἱὸν Αρραν υἱὸν τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ καὶ τὴν Σαραν τὴν νύμφην αὐτοῦ γυναῖκα Αβραμ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐξήγαγεν αὐτοὺς ἐκ τῆς χώρας^[2] τῶν Χαλδαίων πορευθῆναι εἰς τὴν γῆν Χανααν καὶ ἦλθεν ἕως Χαρραν καὶ κατῴκησεν ἐκεῖ.^[3]	^{בראשית יא:לא} וַיִּקַּח תֶּרַח אֶת־אַבְרָם בְּנוֹ וְאֶת־לוֹט בֶּן־הָרָן בֶּן־בְּנוֹ וְאֵת שָׂרַי כַּלָּתוֹ אֵשֶׁת אַבְרָם בְּנוֹ וַיֵּצְאוּ אִתָּם מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים לָלֶכֶת אַרְצָה כְּנַעַן וַיָּבֹאוּ עַד־חָרָן וַיֵּשְׁבוּ שָׁם.		^{בראשית יא:לא} ויקח תרח את אברם בנו ואת לוט בן הרן בן בנו ואת שרי ואת מלכה כלותו אשת אברם ונחור בניו ויוצא אתם מאור כשדים ללכת ארצה כנען ויבאו עד חרן^[4] וישבו שם.
^{Gen 11:31}And Thara took his son Abram and his son’s son, Lot son of Harran, and his daughter–in–law Sara, the wife of Abram his son, and he brought them out of the country of the Chaldeans to go into the land of Chanaan, and he came as far as Ḥarran and he settled there.	^{Gen 11:31}Terah took his son Abram, his grandson Lot the son of Haran, and his daughter-in-law Sarai, the wife of his son Abram, and they set out with them from Ur of the Chaldeans for the land of Canaan; and they came as far as Ḥaran and they settled there.	^{Gen 11:31}Terah took his son Abram, his grandson Lot the son of Haran, and Sarai and Milkah, his daughters-in-law, the wife of Abram and Nahor, his sons, and he brought them out from Ur of the Chaldeans for the land of Canaan; and they came as far as Ḥaran and they settled there.

We will concentrate on the two main sets of differences:

What about Nahor and Milkah?

According to MT and LXX, Terah brings with him only Abram and Sarai, but SP adds that Terah also brought Nahor and Milkah. The SP here is secondary, and added the names harmonistically, as it is wont to do, to explain how Nahor and Milka end up in Ḥaran. This is obvious from the (unintentional?) retention of the singular “wife” in the text instead of the expected “wives.”

The reason for this revision is fairly easy to guess: In the later text Genesis 24:10, when Abraham’s servant goes to find a wife for Isaac, we are told that Aram-naharayim is “the city of Nahor.” In Genesis 29:4–5, when Jacob goes to the same place to escape from his brother, we learn that this same city of Nahor is also called Ḥaran. So if Nahor has been living in Ḥaran, does it not follow that Terah must have brought him along as well when he and Abram moved there?

Isn’t Terah the Leader?

In MT, the subject of the action in this verse changes mid-sentence. It begins with Terah, as the pater familias, taking his family from his home country, but then changes abruptly to the plural, and it is the group that is travelling. The awkward “and they set out with them” ^[5] shows that there is something wrong with this version.

The LXX, SP, and Vulgate (et eduxit eos) reading, that Terah brought them out, is more logical. The consonantal text for both MT and LXX/SP are almost identical, but the differences were created because of a misunderstood defective form of the source text that included but few matres lectiones (vowel letters): The original text read ויצא אתם meant as ויצא אֹתָם “he brought them out”; thus LXX, SP, V. This text developed into or was misunderstood as וַיֵּצְאוּ אִתָּם “they set out with them” in MT.^[6]From here, LXX continues using singular verbs, “he came,” “he settled” while SP and the Vulgate join MT in using plural verbs “they came,” “they settled.”

TheTorah.com is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
We rely on the support of readers like you. Please support us.

Published

August 24, 2023

Last Updated

April 3, 2024

Previous in the Series

Next in the Series

Footnotes

View Footnotes

Published

August 24, 2023

Last Updated

April 3, 2024

^[1] This passage appears at the tail end of the Torah’s list of the patriarchs after the flood (Genesis 11:10–32), which has many internal differences between MT, LXX and SP. For all these, see my “The Genealogical Lists in Genesis 5 and 11 in Three Different Versions,” in Emanuel Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, Qumran, Septuagint: Collected Essays, Volume 3, VTSup 167 (Leiden: Brill, 2015), 221–238. For the biblical chronology, see John Skinner, Genesis, ICC, 3rd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1930), 130, 233.

^[2] The Greek translation χώρας probably developed at the inner-Greek level from a misunderstood transliterated Ωρ reflecting אור (Ur) in the source text of the LXX.

^[3]Moshe Zipor (תרגום השבעים לספר בראשית [The Septuagint Version of the Book of Genesis] [Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan, 2005], 179) offers the following tentative reconstruction of the Vorlage:

ויקח תרח את אברם בנו ואת לוט בן הרן בן בנו ואת שרי כלתו אשת אברם בנו ויוצא אֹתָם מאור כשדים ללכת ארצה כנען ויבֹא עד חרן וישב שם.

^[4]The edition of Abraham Tal and Moshe Florentin has הרן here. But Von Gall’s critical edition, as well as the Samaritan Script edition used in the Samaritan community, have חרן, like MT, and this is what is reflected in the medieval Samaritan Targum as well.

^[5] According to Rashi, the implication of the plural “and they set out with them” is: “and Terah and Abram went out with Lot and Sarai.”

^[6] A scribe or translator may transform the singular to the plural in a case like this since, in early orthography, plural endings were not indicated. See Emanuel Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible: Revised and Expanded Fourth Edition (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2022), 294-295. Editor’s note: A slightly different possibility is a two-step process: first, the text was misunderstood as וַיֵצֵא אִתָּם “and he went out with them,” and this then developed into MT’s וַיֵּצְאוּ אִתָּם “they set out with them.”

^[2] The Greek translation χώρας probably developed at the inner-Greek level from a misunderstood transliterated Ωρ reflecting אור (Ur) in the source text of the LXX.

^[5] According to Rashi, the implication of the plural “and they set out with them” is: “and Terah and Abram went out with Lot and Sarai.”

Prof. Emanuel Tov is J. L. Magnes Professor of Bible (emeritus) in the Dept. of Bible at the Hebrew University, where he received his Ph.D. in Biblical Studies. He was the editor of 33 volumes of Discoveries in the Judean Desert. Among his many publications are, Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert, Textual Criticism of the Bible: An Introduction, The Biblical Encyclopaedia Library 31 and The Text-Critical Use of the Septuagint in Biblical Research.

Essays on Related Topics:

Symposium:More Responses

Terah’s Journey – Genesis 11:31

LXX

MT and Peshitta

Samaritan Pentateuch

What about Nahor and Milkah?

Isn’t Terah the Leader?

On What Day Did God Cease Working? – Genesis 2:2

Terah’s Journey – Genesis 11:31

Laban Searches for His Stolen Idols – Genesis 31:33

How Many Descendants of Jacob Came to Egypt? – Genesis 46:27/Exodus 1:5

The Curse of Simeon and Levi—Genesis 49:5

God as a Warrior – Exodus 15:3

The Song of the Ark – Numbers 10:35–36

Moses “Went” or “Finished”? – Deuteronomy 31:1

The Sons of Israel or God? – Deuteronomy 32:8

Acclaim, O Nations – Deuteronomy 32:43