A Captive Woman’s Transition to Wife

She shaves her head, modifies her nails, changes her clothes, and mourns her parents for a month in the house of her captor. What is the significance of these requirements? What do they reveal about her transition into a new home?

APA Style

Click to copy

"A Captive Woman’s Transition to Wife" (n.d.). TheTorah.com. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://www.thetorah.com/article/a-captive-womans-transition-to-wife

SBL Style

Click to copy

"A Captive Woman’s Transition to Wife." TheTorah.com. Accessed October 30, 2026. https://www.thetorah.com/article/a-captive-womans-transition-to-wife.

A Captive Woman’s Transition to Wife

A non-Israelite captive shaving her head in her captor's home. AI

If an Israelite sees a captive woman that he desires and he wants to marry her, she must first undergo a process:[1]

דברים כא:יבוַהֲבֵאתָהּ אֶל תּוֹךְ בֵּיתֶךָ וְגִלְּחָה אֶת רֹאשָׁהּ וְעָשְׂתָה אֶת צִפׇּרְנֶיהָ.‏
Deut 21:12 You shall bring her into your house, and she shall shave her head,[2] pare (or possibly, let grow) her nails,

House as Liminal Space

The instruction that the woman be brought into and remain "in your house" establishes a spatial parameter that is central to the ritual sequence. In this context, the house becomes an architectural liminal (in-between) space — a threshold in which her former identity is set aside while her future status remains suspended.[3]

Enclosed within the domestic sphere, she is no longer a captive on the battlefield, and not yet a wife. Confining the ritual sequence to the interior of the home creates a physical and symbolic boundary that separates the domain of wartime conquest from the domestic sphere of the household.

Shaving Her Head

Cutting off hair appears in several biblical texts as a visible expression of grief. For example, Job’s response when he is informed that all his children have died when the house they were gathered in collapsed:

איוב א:כ וַיָּקׇם אִיּוֹב וַיִּקְרַע אֶת־מְעִלוֹ וַיָּגׇז אֶת רֹאשׁוֹ וַיִּפֹּל אַרְצָה וַיִּשְׁתָּחוּ.
Job 1:20 Then Job arose, tore his robe, sheared his head, and threw himself on the ground and worshiped.[4]

Modification of Her Nails

The reference to the woman's nails is more elusive. The Bible offers no close ritual parallel, making this feature particularly striking. Whether the verb is understood to mean trimming or allowing the nails to grow, the action concerns bodily modification alongside the shaving of the head.[5] Together these acts alter the captive's physical appearance, marking her body as the site of transition.

Transitioning and Mourning

After the bodily changes, she removes her garments and remains in the house, mourning:

דברים כא:יגוְהֵסִירָה אֶת שִׂמְלַת שִׁבְיָהּ מֵעָלֶיהָ וְיָשְׁבָה בְּבֵיתֶךָ וּבָכְתָה אֶת אָבִיהָ וְאֶת אִמָּהּ יֶרַח יָמִים וְאַחַר כֵּן תָּבוֹא אֵלֶיהָ וּבְעַלְתָּהּ וְהָיְתָה לְךָ לְאִשָּׁה.
Deut 21:13 and she shall discard her captive’s garb. She shall spend a month’s time[6] in your house lamenting her father and mother; after that you may come to her and possess her, and she shall be your wife.

Changing Clothes

The removal of the "clothing of her captivity" employs ritualized language in its unusually specific designation of the garments themselves. The phrase is unique in the Hebrew Bible, marking these clothes not simply as items to be exchanged but as material extensions of the woman’s former status as a captive. It evokes scenes across the Bible where a change of garments marks a fundamental shift in status or identity.

After he is released from the dungeon, Joseph first shaves and then changes garments in preparation for his appearance before Pharaoh:

בראשית מא:יד וַיִּשְׁלַח פַּרְעֹה וַיִּקְרָא אֶת יוֹסֵף וַיְרִיצֻהוּ מִן הַבּוֹר וַיְגַלַּח וַיְחַלֵּף שִׂמְלֹתָיו וַיָּבֹא אֶל פַּרְעֹה.
Gen 41:14 Thereupon Pharaoh sent for Joseph, and he was rushed from the dungeon. He shaved and changed his clothes, and he appeared before Pharaoh.[7]

Notably, changing garments takes on ritual significance when Jacob tells his household to change their clothing before they build an alter to YHWH in Bethel because of their worship of foreign gods:[8]

בראשית לה:ב וַיֹּאמֶר יַעֲקֹב אֶל בֵּיתוֹ וְאֶל כׇּל אֲשֶׁר עִמּוֹ הָסִרוּ אֶת אֱלֹהֵי הַנֵּכָר אֲשֶׁר בְּתֹכְכֶם וְהִטַּהֲרוּ וְהַחֲלִיפוּ שִׂמְלֹתֵיכֶם.
Gen 35:2 So Jacob said to his household and to all who were with him, “Rid yourselves of the alien gods in your midst, purify yourselves, and change your clothes.

In a similar way, priests receive sacred vestments for ordination (Exod 28, 39; more on this later), David washes, anoints himself, and changes clothes after mourning his child (2 Sam 12:20), and Joshua the high priest exchanges soiled garments for clean ones in Zechariah's vision (Zech 3:3–5). Across these texts, clothing functions not merely as attire, but as an outward sign of a transformed social or ritual condition.[9]

A Month of Mourning

The prescribed full month of mourning reflects an ancient Israelite institution,[10] exemplified by the thirty-day periods observed for Aaron (Num 20:29) and Moses:

דברים לד:ח וַיִּבְכּוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת־מֹשֶׁה בְּעַרְבֹת מוֹאָב שְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם וַיִּתְּמוּ יְמֵי בְכִי אֵבֶל מֹשֶׁה.
Deut 34:8 And the Israelites bewailed Moses in the steppes of Moab for thirty days. The period of wailing and mourning for Moses came to an end.

The captive's lament for "her father and her mother" likewise places her within the biblical world of bereavement, acknowledging the severance of familial bonds brought about by war. Read in this light, the legislation grants the woman space to grieve before assuming a new social role.

The Reason for the Process?

Various explanations have been proposed for this process that is required before the man can marry the woman.

Making Her Unappealing to Her Captor

Sifre Deuteronomy (ca. 3rd century C.E.) explains that these actions are designed to render the captive unappealing to deter her captor from marrying her:

ספרי דברים ריג (דברים כא יג) וְהֵסִירָה אֶת שִׂמְלַת שִׁבְיָהּ מֵעָלֶיהָ, מְלַמֵּד שֶׁמַּעֲבִיר מִמֶּנָּה בְּגָדִים נָאִים וּמַלְבִּישָׁהּ בִּגְדֵי אַלְמְנוּת, שֶׁהַגּוֹיִם, אֲרוּרִים הֵם, בְּנוֹתֵיהֶם מִתְקַשְּׁטוֹת בַּמִּלְחָמָה בִּשְׁבִיל לְהַזְנוֹת אֲחֵרִים אַחֲרֵיהֶן.
Sifre Deut 213 “And she shall remove from herself the garment of her captivity” (Deut.21:13). This teaches that they remove from her any fine clothing, and dress her in widow’s garb. For the gentiles—curse them!—prettify their daughters during battles so that others will whore after them.
וְיָשְׁבָה בְּבֵיתֶךָ – בְּבַיִת שֶׁמִּשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בּוֹ; נִתְקָל בָּהּ וְנִכְנָס, נִתְקָל בָּהּ וְיוֹצֵא; דּוֹמָה לְקֵרוּיָה וְרוֹאֶה בְּנִוּוּלָהּ.
“And she will stay in your house” (Deut.21:13)—in the house he normally uses, so that he will trip over her upon entering, and he will trip over her upon leaving, like an old piece of pumpkin. And he will notice her disgrace.[11]

This interpretation probably reflects the dim view these commentators had of intermarriage more than the law’s original intent.

Allowing the Woman to Mourn

Others, such as Philo, have connected the entire sequence of ritual actions in this law with the mourning period (v. 13):

Philo, On Virtues, 111 And you will provide such relief if you cut off the hair on her head, trim her nails, remove the clothes she wore when she was taken captive, and for thirty days leave her alone and allow her to mourn and weep freely for her father and mother and the other members of her family, from whom she has been separated either by death or because they are enduring afflictions in slavery that are worse than death. After these things have been done, join with her as your lawful wife.[12]

Yet mourning alone cannot account for all parts of the ritual (the cutting of her nails and discarding of her garments are not adequately explained), nor is the woman’s experience the sole focus of this sequence.[13]

Indeed, the mourning elements acknowledge profound personal loss, preserving a ritual space in which the captive woman’s grief remains visible even as the legislation is aimed at her incorporation into another household. However, the bodily modifications, change of clothing, domestic seclusion, and fixed period of waiting together facilitate a transition from one social identity to another.[14]

Materializing Identity: Aaron and the Captive Woman

Juxtaposing the captive woman’s ritual sequence with Aaron’s consecration illustrates how clothing directly mediates a change in social role.

שמות כח:גוְאַתָּה תְּדַבֵּר אֶל כׇּל חַכְמֵי לֵב אֲשֶׁר מִלֵּאתִיו רוּחַ חׇכְמָה וְעָשׂוּ אֶת בִּגְדֵי אַהֲרֹן לְקַדְּשׁוֹ לְכַהֲנוֹ לִי.‏
Exod 28:3 Next you shall instruct all who are skillful, whom I have endowed with the gift of skill, to make Aaron’s vestments, to consecrate him for My priesthood.[15]

The captive woman’s ritual follows a comparable logic. Just as Aaron’s garments authorize entry into the sacred realm of the tabernacle, the captive woman’s altered appearance prepares her to cross the threshold into another carefully ordered sphere: the Israelite household.[16] Furthermore, both rites demonstrate that bodily materials can mediate new social realities. For the captive woman, removing the “garments of captivity” and stripping her physical appearance is integral to the rite rather than incidental preparation for marriage.

The physical changes undertaken by the woman not only affect a change in social status, but also serve another purpose. Her assimilation ritual simultaneously functions as a protective domestic rite, guarding the Israelite family against the perceived dangers of war, foreignness, and domestic disruption.[17]

Boundary Crossing and Household Protection

Across ancient West Asia, moments of transition were regarded as particularly dangerous because established social and cosmic boundaries were temporarily suspended. Rituals that transformed identity therefore frequently combined status change with protection against unseen forces.[18]

Although the Mesopotamian rites (discussed below) arise from different cultural settings and respond to different ritual concerns, they share a common ritual grammar. Hair, clothing, nails, and other bodily materials function as media through which dangerous transitions are negotiated, identities are transformed, and households are protected at moments of liminality. Together, these texts illuminate the broader ritual world which Deuteronomy inhabited.

A Ritual Repelling a Demon

The Mesopotamian Lamashtu ritual protects pregnant women, infants, and households from the Lamashtu demoness, who they believe is responsible for miscarriages and infant death, and thus poses a lethal threat to them.[19] She is understood not merely as a malevolent spirit but as an independent supernatural power with agency of her own. She is repelled through carefully prescribed ritual actions involving figurines, clothing, hair, amulets, and other objects closely associated with the body. One of the rituals begins with fashioning a figurine of the demon:

Lamashtu series 1, 47 You make a Daughter-of-Anu from clay. 48 [You cover her head with hair]. A soiled towel 49 you give her as clothing. You prick her with the th[orn of a date palm.] 50 You give her a comb, d[is]taff, (and) a half-sūtu? fla[sk] of oil.[20]

The figurine is then incapacitated:

54In late afternoon, (shortly) before [sunset], you move her (= the figurine of Lamaštu) out into the uncultivated area. 55 You have her face eastward. You fasten a rope around her waist. 56 You bind her to a baltu (and/or) an ašāgu thorn bush. You surround her three times with a magic circle.[21]

The instructions continue with the next steps necessary to drive away the demoness. It is also worth noting her description in a later incantation includes long fingernails and unshaven armpits.[22]

A Rite for Protection against Witches

Whereas the Lamaštu rituals defend households against a demonic assailant, the anti-witchcraft series Maqlû confronts witches who manipulate bodily materials in order to inflict harm.

In these rituals, hair and garments function as ritual media capable of absorbing or transferring malign influences before they are burned, buried, or otherwise disposed of:[23]

Maqlu tablet I, 130 A woman who instigates sorcery has ensorcelled me; ensorcell her with the sorcery with which she ensorcelled me. 131 (Those) who have made figurines corresponding to my figurines, reproduced my facial features, 132 Taken my spittle, plucked out my hair, 133 Cut off my hem, collected a clump of dirt (over which) my feet (had passed), 134 May Girra, the warrior, release their incantation…

These rites assume that the household is vulnerable to invisible cosmic forces that may enter through persons or objects crossing its threshold.[24]

While Deuteronomy never portrays the captive woman as demonic, cursed, or morally suspect, neither does it treat her incorporation as ritually insignificant. She arrives from enemy territory bearing different familial loyalties, cultural practices, and social identity. These tensions are addressed through legal regulation and ritual performance.

A Rite of Incorporation

The process that the captive woman undergoes (Deuteronomy 21:12–13) is best understood as a carefully ordered rite of incorporation. Mourning, bodily modification, change of clothing, domestic seclusion, and the prescribed waiting period each contribute to a process that transforms a foreign captive into a member of an Israelite household without allowing the violence of the conquest to disappear entirely from view.

The sequence serves a double purpose: it accommodates the captive woman’s bereavement and formalizes her involuntary status change, while also drawing on regional protective practices to shield the family from the vulnerabilities of taking in an outsider. By balancing human grief with domestic stability, Deuteronomy relies on bodily material to govern, validate, and integrate her entry into the Israelite home.

In modern times, we may focus on the captive woman's vulnerability, asking whether these actions protect her, erase her identity, or merely regulate male violence after war.[25] These ethical tensions are hard to resolve.[26] Rather than displacing these concerns, we can appreciate how the ritual sequence itself makes space for her mourning, slows her incorporation, recognizes severed kinship ties, and ritualizes rather than erases her transition.[27]

View Footnotes

Published 2026-08-20

  1. The law is introduced as follows:

    דברים כא:י כִּי תֵצֵא לַמִּלְחָמָה עַל אֹיְבֶיךָ וּנְתָנוֹ יְ־הֹוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ בְּיָדֶךָ וְשָׁבִיתָ שִׁבְיוֹ.‏ כא:יא וְרָאִיתָ בַּשִּׁבְיָה אֵשֶׁת יְפַת תֹּאַר וְחָשַׁקְתָּ בָהּ וְלָקַחְתָּ לְךָ לְאִשָּׁה.‏
    Deut 21:10 When you take the field against your enemies, and YHWH your God delivers them into your power and you take some of them captive, 21:11 and you see among the captives a beautiful woman and you desire her and would take her to wife...

    Bible translations are from NJPS with modifications. It is not clear where the protasis ends and the apodosis begins in this law, since the opening כִּי (if/when) is followed by a long chain of waw-consecutive verbs. Here, following the NJPS reading, the apodosis begins in v. 12. Editor’s note: For a discussion of other options and the impact they have on interpretation, see David Resnick, “The Captive Woman at the Intersection of War and Family Laws,” TheTorah (2021).

  2. The stem .ג­­.ל.ח, g.l.ch. in the pi‘el probably means to shave (see, e.g., Lev 13:33; Isa 7:20; Ezek 44:20; 1 Chron 19:4), as is reflected in most translations, though some, such as NJPS, render it as “trim.”

  3. The term liminal, from the Latin limen, “threshold,” refers to a transitional, in-between phase in which one has left one place or stage and not yet entered the next. The ethnographer and folklorist Arnold van Gennep, who coined the term, identified the liminal phase as the middle stage of rites of passage in his work Les rites de passage (1909), translated into English by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee, The Rites of Passage (University of Chicago Press, 1960). His ideas were expanded upon by the anthropologist Victor W. Turner in works such as The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Aldine Publishing Company, 1969). Contemporary scholars such as the sociologist Bjørn Thomassen, Liminality and the Modern: Living Through the In-Between (Routledge, 2014), have further developed their ideas and broadened their application. Editor’s note: For more on liminality, see Ilan Peled, “Blood on the Doorposts: A Rite of Passage Marking Israel’s Freedom,” TheTorah (2026).

  4. See also Isa 15:2; Jer 7:29; and Mic 1:16 for other examples of the association of cutting off hair with grief and mourning. Editor’s note: For a discussion of the broader context of this practice, see Zeb Farber, “The Prohibition of Shaving in the Torah and Halakhah,” TheTorah (2014).

  5. The Hebrew phrase ועשתה את־צפרניה (literally, “and she shall do/make her nails”) is ambiguous, since it is not clear how to interpret .ע.שׂ.ה, ‘.s.h. (to do, make, produce), in this context. The stem can mean “prepare” or “to attend to,” and is used in 2 Sam 19:25 to refer to paring (toe) nails and trimming facial hair, which could be the sense intended here. This aligns with R. Eliezer’s interpretation (Sifre Deuteronomy 212). See also Ramban on Deut 21:12. Yet Targum Onkelos translates the phrase into Aramaic as “and she shall let her nails grow” (ותרבי ית טפרהה), aligning with the view attributed to R. Akiba (also Sifre Deuteronomy 212; see also b. Yebam. 48a) that letting the nails grow long disfigures her and signifies neglect/mourning.

  6. The term יֶרַח refers to a lunar month (29-30 days). The expression יֶרַח יָמִים, a month’s time (a month of days) also occurs in 2 Kgs 15:13.

  7. Both here and in Gen 37:3, Joseph’s change of clothes is associated with elevation of status, while in Gen 37:23 and 39:12, change (in both cases loss) of clothing is associated with loss of status.

  8. This observation was already made by the Riva (11th or 12th century) in his commentary on Deut 21:13.

  9. Among those who have suggested that these steps signify the woman’s change in status from foreign captive to Israelite wife are Anthony Phillips, Deuteronomy, CBC (Cambridge University Press, 1973) 140; Andrew Mayes, Deuteronomy, NCB (Eerdmans, 1981), 303; Richard D. Nelson, Deuteronomy: A Commentary, OTL (Westminster John Knox, 2002), 289; and Carolyn Pressler, The View of Women Found in the Deuteronomic Family Laws, BZAW 216 (Walter de Gruyter, 1993), 11-13.

  10. While mourning periods often last seven days in the Bible (e.g. Gen 50:10; 1 Sam 31:13; Job 2:13), and thirty days is usually associated with extended community mourning for national figures like Moses and Aaron, the period of thirty days could be read as a recognition of the woman’s need to grieve and adjust to her new circumstances. Moreover, As Sandra Jacobs, "Terms of Endearment? The Desirable Female Captive and Her Illicit Acquisition," in A Feminist Companion to Exodus and Deuteronomy, edited by Athalya Brenner and Gale A. Yee (Fortress Press, 2012), 237–257 (243), observes, the period of a month would be sufficient to determine if she were pregnant, based on whether she menstruates.

  11. Translation by Marty Jaffee, Sifrei Devarim (Sefaria.org, 2015). See also Rashi on Deut 21:13; Maimonides, Hilkhot Melakhim 8:5; and R. Akiva in Sifre Deuteronomy 212. For discussion of this traditional rabbinic view that these steps were a deliberate mechanism of delay and deterrence, see Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy, JPS Torah Commentary (Jewish Publication Society, 1996), 193-194.

  12. Translation from Walter Wilson. Philo of Alexandria: On Virtues: Introduction, Translation, and Commentary (Brill, 2011), 65. See also Josephus, Ant. 4.257–259; Ramban on Deut 21:12; Tigay, Deuteronomy, 193–194; Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy 21:10–34:12, WBC 6B (Thomas Nelson, 2002), 475–477.

  13. As Pressler, The View of Women Found in the Deuteronomic Family Laws, 10, notes, the law in v. 10-13 is addressed to the man “and, in the first place, regulates his behavior.”

  14. Sandra Jacobs, The Body as Property: Physical Disfigurement in Biblical Law, LHBOTS 582 (Bloomsbury/T&T Clark, 2014), 190, argues that biblical legal traditions employ bodily modification to verify changes in proprietary entitlement. For example, ear piercing permanently marks the slave's transfer into perpetual servitude (Deut 15:16-17). Read against this context, the captive woman’s ritual sequence accomplishes a visible shift in status. While permanent alterations like ear piercing mark fixed social roles, Deuteronomy employs temporary physical changes to frame a threshold transition. This process publicly communicates her transfer of authority, utilizing her altered appearance to establish her new identity as a dependent member of an Israelite household.

  15. It continues with a list of the required vestments:

    שמות כח:ד וְאֵלֶּה הַבְּגָדִים אֲשֶׁר יַעֲשׂוּ חֹשֶׁן וְאֵפוֹד וּמְעִיל וּכְתֹנֶת תַּשְׁבֵּץ מִצְנֶפֶת וְאַבְנֵט וְעָשׂוּ בִגְדֵי קֹדֶשׁ לְאַהֲרֹן אָחִיךָ וּלְבָנָיו לְכַהֲנוֹ לִי.
    Exod 28:4 These are the vestments they are to make: a breastpiece, an ephod, a robe, a fringed tunic, a headdress, and a sash. They shall make those sacral vestments for your brother Aaron and his sons, for priestly service to Me.

    Aaron’s elaborately crafted vestments belong to the ritual apparatus of the tabernacle. They equip him to לְשָׁרֵת בַּקֹּדֶשׁ, lesharet bakodesh, “minister in the holy place” (Exod 28:43). By clothing Aaron in these garments, the ordination rite establishes the authority required for him to enter sacred space.

    Alice Mandell’s analysis of Aaron’s vestments in “Writing as a Source of Ritual Authority: The High Priest’s Body as a Priestly Text in the Tabernacle-Building Story,” Journal of Biblical Literature 141.1 (2022): 43-64 (45-46), provides a compelling framework for this dynamic. Mandell further demonstrates in “Aaron’s Body as a Ritual Vessel in the Exodus Tabernacle Building Narrative,” in New Perspectives on Ritual in the Biblical World, ed. Laura Quick and Melissa Ramos, LHBOTS 702 (T&T Clark, 2022), 159–81, that ritual meaning emerges through the interplay of language, physical objects, visual design, and bodily action. Under this view, physical materials are not passive backdrops; their raw craftsmanship and performance context combine to render status both visible and ritually effective.

  16. Placing these two rites side by side reveals a profound structural asymmetry. Aaron enters the priesthood through an office of distinction, elevated into sacred authority through the investiture of magnificent vestments. By contrast, the captive woman undergoes a forced, subjugating transformation born of military violence and defeat; her bodily alterations reflect not elevation, but the humiliation of captivity and total social displacement. Mónica Isabel Rey, “Head Shaving as a Ritual of Enslavement in Deuteronomy 21:10–14,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 93, no. 4 (2025): 643–658, demonstrates that head shaving belongs to a wider ancient West Asian tradition of visually marking enslaved captives. Even if one pauses over whether the captive woman remains enslaved or eventually transitions to a recognized spouse legally, Rey's insight rightly underscores how bodily alteration publicly announced a profound shift in status recognizable to surrounding communities.

  17. Resnick, “The Captive Woman at the Intersection of War and Family Laws,” observes that Deuteronomy expresses anxiety about this unusual marriage, noting concerns about intermarriage with outsiders, the possibility that the woman might introduce foreign religious practices into the Israelite household, and the likelihood that both husband and family would continue to regard her as a slave rather than a full Israelite wife. These observations identify the social and religious tensions surrounding the captive woman's incorporation into an Israelite household that this legislation seeks to address.

  18. Editor’s note: Peled, “Blood on the Doorposts: A Rite of Passage Marking Israel’s Freedom,” identifies the Hebrew slaves’ act of smearing blood on their doorframes so their households will be spared the final plague (Exodus 12) as an example of such an apotropaic practice. He notes that the next day they are freed from slavery and set off on their journey into the wilderness, so the act also serves as a rite of passage.

  19. Editor’s note: Kristine Henrickson Garroway, “The Origins of the Biblical Pesach,” TheTorah (2015) suggests that the Pesach ritual of smearing blood on the doorframe in Exodus 12 was originally, in its earliest form, a protection ritual for babies, intended to keep them safe from the baby snatching demoness Lamashtu (later identified in Jewish lore as Lillith) and other divine forces that would harm them.

  20. Once adorned, the figurine is given travel provisions before it is sent away. The description of the provisions continues:

    51With [gr]oats, malt, brewing mixture, roasted barley, (and) dried bread 52 you [fi]ll four [leather] b[ags]; then you make four [don]keys of clay.

    Translations from Walter Farber, Lamaštu: An edition of the Canonical Series of Lamaštu Incantations and Rituals and Related Texts from the Second and First Millennia B.C. (Eisenbrauns, 2014), 151.

  21. Farber, Lamaštu, 151.

  22. Lamashtu series 1, 109. Farber, Lamaštu, 155.

  23. Translation from Tzvi Abusch, The Witchcraft Series Maqlû, Writings from the Ancient World ( SBL Press, 2015), 289.

  24. Another example is the ritual of Tunnawiya, a Hittite purification ritual targeting concerns with reproduction. The ceremony was performed for clients with medical issues or concerns and proscribed a series of actions meant to transfer impurity from the afflicted person onto substitute objects. Hair, garments, and other bodily extensions function as vehicles through which contamination may be displaced by destroying the substitute object. See Billie Jean Collins, “Women in Hittite Ritual,” in Women in the Ancient Near East: A Sourcebook, ed. Mark W. Chavalas, Routledge Sourcebooks for the Ancient World (Routledge, 2014), 246–271.

  25. For a summary of recent survey of work on this topic, see Sandra Jacobs, “Women in Deuteronomy,” in The Oxford Handbook of Deuteronomy, ed. Don C. Benjamin (Oxford University Press, 2024).

  26. This article does not attempt to resolve those ethical tensions. It does, however, share the concerns, articulated especially within womanist scholarship, that the text should be read with attention to the captive woman's humanity and lived experience. See, e.g., Wil Gafney, Womanist Midrash: A Re-examination of the Quotidian Ways of Biblical Women (Westminster John Knox, 2017); Renita J. Weems, Just a Sister Away: Understanding the Stories of Women of the Bible (LuraMedia, 1988); and Stephanie Buckhanon Crowder, “Womanist Biblical Interpretation,” in The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Approaches to the Hebrew Bible, ed. Susanne Scholz (Oxford University Press, 2020), 45–60.

  27. It is not clear that the legislation of Deut 21:10–14 was routinely implemented or that it provides direct evidence of historical legal practice. References to "the woman" and “her” embodiment in this article reflect the figure constructed within the legislation itself and serve to foreground the humanity of women captured in war.