How YHWH Became King of the Universe

Israel’s deity becomes a universal God and the political power behind human affairs. This is just one of seven historical shifts in how the Bible conceives of “theocracy,” divine political power.

APA Style

Click to copy

"How YHWH Became King of the Universe" (n.d.). TheTorah.com. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://www.thetorah.com/article/how-yhwh-became-king-of-the-universe

SBL Style

Click to copy

"How YHWH Became King of the Universe." TheTorah.com. Accessed October 30, 2026. https://www.thetorah.com/article/how-yhwh-became-king-of-the-universe.

How YHWH Became King of the Universe

Creation of Light and Darkness, anonymous, after Johann Sadeler, 1639 (adapted). Rijksmuseum

In Jewish liturgy, blessings begin by describing God as מֶלֶךְ הָעוֹלָם “king of the universe” or “eternal king.” Implicit in this description is that humans in general, and the people of Israel in particular, are subject to God’s rules. Indeed, this is the straightforward implication of the Torah’s law collections.

In the political realm, such a concept is known as theocracy, a Greek term meaning “divine power.”[1] This word was created by Josephus (ca. 37/38–ca. 100 C.E.) in his defense of Judaism:

Againt Apion 2:164–165 Some peoples have entrusted the supreme political power to monarchies, others to oligarchies, yet others to the masses. Our lawgiver, however, was attracted by none of these forms of polity, but gave to his constitution the form of what – if a forced expression be permitted – may be termed a “theocracy” placing all sovereignty and authority in the hands of God.[2]

Years later, the Jewish philosopher Benedict (Baruch) Spinoza (1632–1677) characterized the Torah’s system in the same way: 

Tractatus Theologico-Politicus The sovereignty of the Jews, then, was held by God alone; and it was the covenant alone which justified them in calling their state God’s kingdom (Regnum Dei) and god their king, and hence in calling the enemies of their state the enemies of God, citizens who aimed at usurping the sovereignty traitors to God, and, finally, their civil laws the laws and commandments of God.…

In short, there was no distinction at all between civil law and religion. This was why their state could be called a theocracy – because its citizens were only bound by laws revealed by God.[3]

Josephus and Spinoza were looking at the entire Bible, more or less as we have it, and interpreting its theology holistically. Nevertheless, the concept of theocracy developed in many stages.

Stage 1: Monarchic Period

During the period of the Israelite and Judean monarchies, the divine kingship of YHWH determined the royal ideology. This is visible in ancient Psalms in which YHWH, the former weather deity, gains the heavenly throne as divine warrior and king among the gods in Jerusalem:

תהלים כד:ח מִי זֶה מֶלֶךְ הַכָּבוֹד יְ־הוָה עִזּוּז וְגִבּוֹר יְ־הוָה גִּבּוֹר מִלְחָמָה.
Ps 24:8 Who is the King of glory? YHWH, strong and mighty, YHWH, mighty in battle.[4]

In this early period, according to the concept in Jerusalem, YHWH reigned through the proxy of the Davidic dynasty. This too is reflected in several psalms from the monarchic period. For example, at the end of Psalm 18 (=2 Samuel 22), after the psalmist thanks YHWH for his salvation, we find a summary statement:

תהלים יח:נא מגדל [מַגְדִּיל] יְשׁוּעוֹת מַלְכּוֹ וְעֹשֶׂה חֶסֶד לִמְשִׁיחוֹ לְדָוִד וּלְזַרְעוֹ עַד עוֹלָם.
Ps 18:51 He accords great victories to His king, keeps faith with His anointed, with David and his offspring forever.[5]

The Davidic King Is YHWH’s Vassal

In the later 7th century, at the end of the Neo-Assyrian period, the Deuteronomic reform under King Josiah built upon this perspective when it declares all worship sites outside the royal Temple of Jerusalem to be illegitimate. It further envisions Israel creating an Assyrian-type vassal treaty with YHWH, living under divine rule, with the Davidic king as YHWH’s vassal, as he had been to the Assyrian king previously.

Not long after the reform, however, when King Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem together with its Temple, and exiled much of its population, including and especially its intelligentsia, to Babylon, this hope collapsed. The Babylonian conquest effectively ending Judah’s term as a politically sovereign kingdom.

Stage 2: A Post-Exilic Deuteronomistic Scribal Narrative: Renewing the Covenant at Horeb

Following the destruction and exile, the Deuteronomists explained that the disaster was a result of the continuous apostasy of the Israelite and Judahite kings.[6] Thus, they proposed renewing Israel’s connection with YHWH based not upon the Davidic kingship but on the ancient Sinai/Horeb covenant to worship YHWH alone.[7]

In the updated Deuteronomistic version of the revelation at the mountain, the Israelite priesthood, represented by Aaron, sins by building the Golden Calf, but YHWH nevertheless agrees to renew the covenant (Exod 32, 34, Deut 9–10).[8] This story serves as a paradigm for a new beginning, as the post-exilic community looked ahead for how they would reestablish their own covenant with YHWH and rebuild Judah.

The post-exilic Deuteronomistic school did not see the necessity of renewing the kingship. On the contrary, in the Deuteronomistic layer of the book of Samuel, YHWH declares the people’s request to install a king is nothing less than a rejection of their God as their ruler:

שמואל א ח:ז ‏...כִּי אֹתִי מָאֲסוּ מִמְּלֹךְ עֲלֵיהֶם.
1 Sam 8:7 …For they have rejected me from being king over them!”

And Samuel then explains this to the people:

שמואל א י:יט וְאַתֶּם הַיּוֹם מְאַסְתֶּם אֶת אֱלֹהֵיכֶם אֲשֶׁר הוּא מוֹשִׁיעַ לָכֶם מִכָּל רָעוֹתֵיכֶם וְצָרֹתֵיכֶם וַתֹּאמְרוּ לוֹ[9] כִּי מֶלֶךְ תָּשִׂים עָלֵינוּ...
1 Sam 10:19 But today you have rejected your God who delivered you from all your troubles and calamities. For you said to him, “set up a king over us!”…

While some circles supported reestablishing a Davidic kingdom under Zerubbabel, as reflected in the books of Haggai and Zechariah, they ultimately failed.[10] Instead, Judea was dominated by the Temple priesthood[11] and a series of governors appointed by Persia, most famously Nehemiah.

Stage 3: YHWH as the Only God and Divine Patron of the Persian Empire

Grappling with the loss of the Davidic kingship, and what this meant for YHWH’s kingship, prophetic circles responsible for the oracles collected in Deutero-Isaiah, accepted the role of the Persian King Cyrus as YHWH’s shepherd and anointed one:

ישעיה מד:כח הָאֹמֵר לְכוֹרֶשׁ רֹעִי וְכָל חֶפְצִי יַשְׁלִם וְלֵאמֹר לִירוּשָׁלַ͏ִם תִּבָּנֶה וְהֵיכָל תִּוָּסֵד.
Isa 44:28 I am the same who says of Cyrus, “He is My shepherd; he shall fulfill all My purposes! He shall say of Jerusalem, ‘She shall be rebuilt,’ and to the Temple: ‘You shall be founded again.’”
מה:א כֹּה אָמַר יְ־הוָה לִמְשִׁיחוֹ לְכוֹרֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר הֶחֱזַקְתִּי בִימִינוֹ לְרַד לְפָנָיו גּוֹיִם וּמָתְנֵי מְלָכִים אֲפַתֵּחַ לִפְתֹּחַ לְפָנָיו דְּלָתַיִם וּשְׁעָרִים לֹא יִסָּגֵרוּ.
45:1 Thus said YHWH to Cyrus, His anointed one—whose right hand He has grasped, treading down nations before him, ungirding the loins of kings, opening doors before him and letting no gate stay shut…

As for the position the Davidic king once held as YHWH’s servant, Deutero-Isaiah transfers this title to an unnamed future figure who will bring about universal knowledge of YHWH:

ישעיה מב:א הֵן עַבְדִּי אֶתְמָךְ בּוֹ בְּחִירִי רָצְתָה נַפְשִׁי נָתַתִּי רוּחִי עָלָיו מִשְׁפָּט לַגּוֹיִם יוֹצִיא.
Isa 42:1 This is My servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one, in whom I delight. I have put My spirit upon him, he shall teach law (!) to the nations.

Indeed, in Deutero-Isaiah, YHWH as the only real God, becomes for the first time the universal divine king of the world:

ישעיה מד:ו כֹּה אָמַר יְ־הוָה מֶלֶךְ יִשְׂרָאֵל וְגֹאֲלוֹ יְ־הוָה צְבָאוֹת אֲנִי רִאשׁוֹן וַאֲנִי אַחֲרוֹן וּמִבַּלְעָדַי אֵין אֱלֹהִים.
Isa 44:6 Thus said YHWH, the King of Israel, their Redeemer, YHWH of Hosts: I am the first and I am the last, and there is no god but Me.
ישעיה מה:ה אֲנִי יְ־הוָה וְאֵין עוֹד זוּלָתִי אֵין אֱלֹהִים...
Isa 45:5 I am YHWH and there is none else; beside Me, there is no god…[12]

Deutero-Isaiah is not merely reacting to Judean political powerlessness, but is responding to the Babylonian theology, in which their chief god, Marduk, is king of the world and rules over all the other gods.[13] In response, Deutero-Isaiah depicts YHWH as the acknowledged universal deity of creation, who has elected the small people of Israel to become his people and serve as witnesses for teaching the rest of the world. YHWH also occupies the place of the Persian deity Ahura-Mazda, the deity Cyrus actually worshipped.[14]

In short, the confession of Jewish monotheism is central for the renewal of the post-exilic Israelite-Jewish religion, and we see it further developed in the Priestly Text of the Torah, whose base layer Pg (Grundschrift¸ “basic layer”) dates to the early Second Temple period as well.

The Universal God of Pg

In the Priestly text, YHWH is the universal Elohîm for all peoples. He creates the world (Genesis 1), reveals himself as El Shadday to the ancestors, and then as YHWH to Moses (Exod 6), who proclaims YHWH as the true God of the world before Pharaoh. For example, Moses explains that he is giving Pharaoh the option to choose exactly when the frogs will be removed from Egypt,

שמות ח:ו ...לְמַעַן תֵּדַע כִּי אֵין כַּי־הוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ.
Exod 8:6 … that you may know that there is none like YHWH our God.[15]

YHWH’s message to Pharaoh through Moses about the hail makes the point more clearly:

שמות ט:יד כִּי בַּפַּעַם הַזֹּאת אֲנִי שֹׁלֵחַ אֶת כָּל מַגֵּפֹתַי אֶל לִבְּךָ וּבַעֲבָדֶיךָ וּבְעַמֶּךָ בַּעֲבוּר תֵּדַע כִּי אֵין כָּמֹנִי בְּכָל הָאָרֶץ. ט:טו כִּי עַתָּה שָׁלַחְתִּי אֶת יָדִי וָאַךְ אוֹתְךָ וְאֶת עַמְּךָ בַּדָּבֶר וַתִּכָּחֵד מִן הָאָרֶץ. ט:טז וְאוּלָם בַּעֲבוּר זֹאת הֶעֱמַדְתִּיךָ בַּעֲבוּר הַרְאֹתְךָ אֶת כֹּחִי וּלְמַעַן סַפֵּר שְׁמִי בְּכָל הָאָרֶץ.
Exod 9:14 For this time I will send all My plagues upon your person, and your courtiers, and your people, in order that you may know that there is none like Me in all the world. 9:15 I could have stretched forth My hand and stricken you and your people with pestilence, and you would have been effaced from the earth. 9:16 Nevertheless I have spared you for this purpose: in order to show you My power, and in order that My fame may resound throughout the world.[16]

Like in Deutero-Isaiah, YHWH wishes his dominion to be recognized not merely by Israelites, but by the entire world, and as such, he works to get the attention of the ruler of a world superpower. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that we see the same type of phraseology “in order that you may know” in YHWH’s message to Cyrus in Deutero-Isaiah (the only other place this phrase appears in the Bible):

ישעיה מה:ג וְנָתַתִּי לְךָ אוֹצְרוֹת חֹשֶׁךְ וּמַטְמֻנֵי מִסְתָּרִים לְמַעַן תֵּדַע כִּי אֲנִי יְ־הוָה הַקּוֹרֵא בְשִׁמְךָ אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.
Isa 45:3 I will give you treasures concealed in the dark  And secret hoards—  so that you may know that it is I YHWH, the God of Israel, who call you by name.

At the same time, this supremely important deity has adopted the small and inconsequential nation of Israel as his special people, and at Mount Sinai promises to dwell in their midst in the Tabernacle:

שמות כט:מה וְשָׁכַנְתִּי בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְהָיִיתִי לָהֶם לֵאלֹהִים. כט:מו וְיָדְעוּ כִּי אֲנִי יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵיהֶם אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִי אֹתָם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם לְשָׁכְנִי בְתוֹכָם אֲנִי יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵיהֶם.
Exod 29:45 I will abide among the Israelites, and I will be their God. 29:46 And they shall know that I YHWH am their God, who brought them out from the land of Egypt that I might abide among them, I YHWH their God.

In Pg, like in Deutero-Isaiah, we have a universal deity recognized (albeit after much coercion) by a powerful king, but who chooses the small and inconsequential people of Israel as his main vehicle for introducing himself to the world.

Unsurprisingly, in Pg, YHWH’s main interaction with humanity is through Temple service, with the Aaronide priesthood holding a special place in history beginning with the exodus.

Stage 4: The Levitical Priesthood and the Hexateuch

The frame of the Torah was born when the Priestly text (Pg) was combined with the core of Deuteronomy and Joshua—what some scholars call DtrL (Landeroberungserzählung [land conquest narrative]) to form the Hexateuch,[17] which presents Moses as the original and paradigmatic עֶבֶד יְ־הוָה “servant of YHWH” (Josh 1:1).

In a further development of the Golden Calf story, it is Moses’ intercession that saves Israel from extermination, making a new covenant possible.

While the scribes of the Hexateuchal Composition did not exclude the possibility of renewing the monarchy, they recast the monarch as someone completely dedicated to the Torah from the Levitical priests (Deut 17):

דברים יז:יח וְהָיָה כְשִׁבְתּוֹ עַל כִּסֵּא מַמְלַכְתּוֹ וְכָתַב לוֹ אֶת מִשְׁנֵה הַתּוֹרָה הַזֹּאת עַל סֵפֶר מִלִּפְנֵי הַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם.
Deut 17:18 When he has taken the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself a copy of this law on a scroll in the presence of the Levitical priests.[18]

Legitimate priestly families are now only Levitical, הַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם,[19] i.e., from the tribe of Moses, chosen to minister to YHWH, bless the people, and serve as judges:

דברים כא:ה וְנִגְּשׁוּ הַכֹּהֲנִים בְּנֵי לֵוִי כִּי בָם בָּחַר יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ לְשָׁרְתוֹ וּלְבָרֵךְ בְּשֵׁם יְ־הוָה וְעַל פִּיהֶם יִהְיֶה כָּל רִיב וְכָל נָגַע.
Deut 21:5 The priests, sons of Levi,[20] shall come forward; for YHWH your God has chosen them to minister to Him and to pronounce blessing in the name of YHWH, and every lawsuit and case of assault is subject to their ruling.

Moreover, they are tasked with carrying the ark, which holds the law of YHWH to which all, even the king, are subject:

דברים י:ח בָּעֵת הַהִוא הִבְדִּיל יְ־הוָה אֶת שֵׁבֶט הַלֵּוִי לָשֵׂאת אֶת אֲרוֹן בְּרִית יְ־הוָה לַעֲמֹד לִפְנֵי יְ־הוָה לְשָׁרְתוֹ וּלְבָרֵךְ בִּשְׁמוֹ עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה.
Deut 10:8 At that time YHWH set apart the tribe of Levi to carry the Ark of YHWH’S Covenant, to stand in attendance upon YHWH, and to bless in His name, as is still the case.

The story of how the Levites were the ones who did not worship the calf, and instead brought down YHWH’s justice upon the heads of the sinners (Exod 32:26–29) serves as the foundation myth for this Levitical priestly system.[21]

Zadokite Priests: Some Pushback from Ezekiel

That priests are only from the tribe of Levi was in tension with the family of Zadokite priests, who served in the Jerusalem Temple and likely saw themselves as an independent priestly family with no ties to the myth of Levitical origin. The book of Ezekiel attempts to solve this tension, by accepting the Levitical framework but claiming that Zadokites are indeed Levitical, but a special subgroup chosen for service in the Temple:

יחזקאל מד:טו וְהַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם בְּנֵי צָדוֹק אֲשֶׁר שָׁמְרוּ אֶת מִשְׁמֶרֶת מִקְדָּשִׁי בִּתְעוֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מֵעָלַי הֵמָּה יִקְרְבוּ אֵלַי לְשָׁרְתֵנִי וְעָמְדוּ לְפָנַי לְהַקְרִיב לִי חֵלֶב וָדָם נְאֻם אֲדֹנָי יְ־הוִה.
Ezek 44:15 But the Levitical priests descended from Zadok, who maintained the service of My Sanctuary when the people of Israel went astray from Me—they shall approach Me to minister to Me; they shall stand before Me to offer Me fat and blood—declares the Lord YHWH.[22]

Notably, the book of Ezekiel is future focused. In the final chapters, it envisions what will be the proper order in the next Temple. Moreover, in the early chapters, YHWH’s revelation takes place in Babylon, not in Jerusalem, and on a flying throne that is independent from the Sanctuary.[23]

Stage 5: God Beyond the Temple: All of Israel Is Holy

The Ezekiel scribal circle influenced the formation of the Pentateuch.[24] Here YHWH’s kavod “glory,” present in the midst of a fire and a cloud, descends to reveal himself to Moses in a tent of meeting separate from the people (Exod 33:7–11).[25]

In contrast to Ezekiel’s visions, who only perceives the deity in a veiled manner, Moses speaks to YHWH face to face:

שמות לג:יא וְדִבֶּר יְהוָה אֶל מֹשֶׁה פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים כַּאֲשֶׁר יְדַבֵּר אִישׁ אֶל רֵעֵהוּ וְשָׁב אֶל הַמַּחֲנֶה...
Exod 33:11 YHWH would speak to Moses face to face, as one man speaks to another. And he would then return to the camp…

From the Tent of Meeting, Moses receives the revelations of the Holiness Code, where the concept of “Levitical priests” has vanished. Israel shall be a holy congregation:

ויקרא יט:ב דַּבֵּר אֶל כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵהֶם קְדֹשִׁים תִּהְיוּ כִּי קָדוֹשׁ אֲנִי יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵיכֶם.
Lev 19:2 Speak to the whole Israelite community and say to them: “You shall be holy, for I, YHWH your God, am holy.”

The expansion of divine revelation reported in the Sinai-Pericope makes this same point:

שמות יט:ה וְעַתָּה אִם שָׁמוֹעַ תִּשְׁמְעוּ בְּקֹלִי וּשְׁמַרְתֶּם אֶת בְּרִיתִי וִהְיִיתֶם לִי סְגֻלָּה מִכָּל הָעַמִּים כִּי לִי כָּל הָאָרֶץ. יט:ו וְאַתֶּם תִּהְיוּ לִי מַמְלֶכֶת כֹּהֲנִים וְגוֹי קָדוֹשׁ...
Exod 19:5 Now then, if you will obey Me faithfully and keep My covenant, you shall be My treasured possession among all the peoples. Indeed, all the earth is Mine, 19:6 but you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.

Even so, H doesn’t cancel the priesthood entirely, but following the Levitical model, presents a genealogy of Aaron as an offspring of Levi (Exod 6:13–27).

Stage 6: The Power of the High Priest and Theocracy

With the failure of the Davidic dynasty to reestablish its power in post-exilic Judea, the central position of the anointed High Priest was strengthened as the main representative of the Judean community. In Trito-Isaiah, can be heard proclaiming himself to be imbued with the divine spirit:

ישעיה סא:א רוּחַ אֲדֹנָי יְ־הוִה עָלָי יַעַן מָשַׁח יְ־הוָה אֹתִי לְבַשֵּׂר עֲנָוִים שְׁלָחַנִי לַחֲבֹשׁ לְנִשְׁבְּרֵי לֵב לִקְרֹא לִשְׁבוּיִם דְּרוֹר וְלַאֲסוּרִים פְּקַח קוֹחַ.
Isa 61:1 The spirit of the Lord YHWH is upon me, because YHWH has anointed me; He has sent me as a herald of joy to the humble, to bind up the wounded of heart, to proclaim release to the captives, liberation to the imprisoned.[26]

At the same time, the late Priestly reworkings of the Pentateuch[27] focus on the formation of the congregation (qahal) of Israel as edah – a political and a Temple community. It is the task of the Aaronide high priest to put the Name of YHWH onto the People in an ancient blessing[28] now recast as the Aaronide blessing (Num 6:22–27):

במדבר ו:כז וְשָׂמוּ אֶת שְׁמִי עַל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַאֲנִי אֲבָרֲכֵם.
Num 6:27 Thus they shall link My name with the people of Israel, and I will bless them.

Moses, the servant of YHWH (Exod 14:31) proclaims the kingdom of YHWH in the Song at the Sea:

שמות טו:יז תְּבִאֵמוֹ וְתִטָּעֵמוֹ בְּהַר נַחֲלָתְךָ מָכוֹן לְשִׁבְתְּךָ פָּעַלְתָּ יְ־הוָה מִקְּדָשׁ אֲדֹנָי כּוֹנְנוּ יָדֶיךָ. טו:יח יְ־הוָה יִמְלֹךְ לְעֹלָם וָעֶד.
Exod 15:17 You will bring them and plant them in Your own mountain, the place You made to dwell in, O YHWH, the sanctuary, O YHWH, which Your hands established. 15:18 YHWH will be king for ever and ever!”

The Song coincides with late theocratic reworkings in the Book of Psalms (Ps 92; 95; 97; 99).[29]

Stage 7: The Return of the Davidic King in Chronicles

The book of Chronicles rewrites the stories of Samuel and Kings. It is aware of the late priestly layers of the Pentateuch, especially the lineages of the Zadokides. When this “history” of the Israelites is written during the early Ptolemaic Period (4th cent. B.C.E.), the hope of a renewal of the kingdom arose again, and these Judean scribes wished to produce positive examples for a possible David redivivus.

For example, unlike in Samuel, in Chronicles, David is responsible for planning the Temple, which not only replaces the wilderness tabernacle but houses it:

דברי הימים ו:טז וְאֵלֶּה אֲשֶׁר הֶעֱמִיד דָּוִיד עַל יְדֵי שִׁיר בֵּית יְ־הוָה מִמְּנוֹחַ הָאָרוֹן. ו:יז וַיִּהְיוּ מְשָׁרְתִים לִפְנֵי מִשְׁכַּן אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד בַּשִּׁיר עַד בְּנוֹת שְׁלֹמֹה אֶת בֵּית יְ־הוָה בִּירוּשָׁלָ͏ִם וַיַּעַמְדוּ כְמִשְׁפָּטָם עַל עֲבוֹדָתָם.
1 Chron 6:16 These were appointed by David to be in charge of song in the House of YHWH, from the time the Ark came to rest. 6:17 They served at the Tabernacle of the Tent of Meeting with song until Solomon built the House of YHWH in Jerusalem; and they carried out their duties as prescribed for them.

In Chronicles, the role of the high priests in the description of history and religious reforms remains hidden behind the narratives on reforms of the kings, who – referring to the Priestly texts in Numbers 3–10, 17–18, 20, and 27 – establish priestly and Levitical divisions (1 Chron 24–26), established judiciary (2 Chron 19), and purged the temple (2 Chron 29).[30] Indeed, this renewed focus on the importance of David and his descendants in the divine plan leads naturally into the messianic concept of a descendent of David emerging in the future and redeeming the Israelites, or in some framings, the entire world.

An Everchanging Model of Theocracy

In sum, the scriptures within a forthgoing development of scribal discourses and narratives bear witness to the conviction in an ongoing process of divine self-revelation.[31] Starting with YHWH as king through the Davidic monarch, post-exilic scribes grappled with how YHWH’s rule would be represented on earth without a Davidic kingdom: through the priesthood, through the Torah, or perhaps through the people’s own holiness. Thus, the loss of the Davidic kingdom brings to the fore YHWH’s direct rule over Israel, through the people’s acceptance of his Torah. 

View Footnotes

Published 2023-09-14

  1. For a discussion of the origins and function of the term cf. Michael Konkel, “Die Theokratie als Idee und Anstalt—Geschichte Israels und Judentum in der protestantischen Exegese des 19. Jahrhunderts” [Theocracy as Idea and Institution—The History of Israel and Judaism in Nineteenth-Century Protestant Exegesis] in: Die Konstruktion des Jüdischen in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, Studien zur Geschichte des Judentums [The Construction of the Jewish Past and Present: Studies in the History of Judaism], ed. Alexandra Ponthen, and Henning Theißen (Paderboren: Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag, 2003), 71-85; Christoph Levin, “Israel, the People of God, as Theocracy,” in, Theokratie: Exegetische und wirkungsgeschichtliche Ansätze [Theocracy: Exegetical and Historical-Impact Approaches], ed. Peter Juhás, Róbert Lapko, and Reinhard Müller, (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021), 65–84.

  2. Trans. H.St.J. Thackeray, LCL 186, (1926), 359.

  3. Baruch de Spinoza, The Political Works: The Tractatus Theologico-Politicus in Part and the Tractatus Politicus in Full (1670’), ed. and trans. A.G. Wenham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958), 157, 159.

  4. There are many other such psalms. See discussion in, Reinhard Müller, Jahwe als Wettergott. Studien zur althebräischen Kultlyrik anhand ausgewählter Psalmen [Yahweh as Weather God : Studies on Ancient Hebrew Cult Poetry Based on Selected Psalms] BZAW 387 (Berlin : De Gruyter, 2008) ; Friedhelm Hartenstein, Das Angesicht JHWHs. Studien zu seinem höfischen und kultischen Bedeutungshintergrund in den Psalmen und in Exodus 32–34 [The Face of YHWH: Studies on Its Courtly and Cultic Semantic Background in the Psalms and in Exodus 32–34], FAT 55, (Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2008); Reettakaisa Sofia Salo, Die judäische Königsideologie im Kontext der Nachbarkulturen. Untersuchungen zu den Königspsalmen 2,18, 20, 21, 45 und 72 [The Judean Royal Ideology in the Context of Neighboring Cultures: Studies on Royal Psalms 2, 18, 20, 21, 45, and 72], ORA 25, (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017). 

  5. Editor’s note: For more on this psalm, see Aubrey E. Buster, “David’s Double Narration of YHWH’s Salvation: Psalm 18,” TheTorah (2023).

  6. The scribes who favored the reform program of the pre-exilic Deuteronomic law of centralization during the exile and in the late exilic period are in German exegesis described as “Deuteronomists.” Cf. Thomas Römer, The So-called Deuteronomistic History: A Sociological, Historical and Literary Introduction (Bloomsbury : T & T Clark, 2005).

  7. See for a detailed analysis of this Deuteronomistic reframing of Deuteronomy’s laws in Eckart Otto, Deuteronomium 1–11. Zweiter Teilband: 4,44–11,32, Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Alten Testament (Freiburg: Herder, 2012), 623–769, 924–1002.

  8. Editor’s note: For an analysis of the story as post-exilic, see Nathan MacDonald, “The Golden Calf: A Post-Exilic Message of Forgiveness,” TheTorah (2021).

  9. Some MSS have לֹא and thus, NJPS translations “No, set up…”

  10. Much of what follows comes from Reinhard Achenbach, “Theocratic Reworking in the Pentateuch. Proto-Chronistic Features in the Late Priestly Layers of Numbers and Their Reception in Chronicles”, in, Chronicles and the Priestly Literature of the Hebrew Bible, ed., Jaeyoung Jeon and Louis C. Jonker, BZAW 528 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021), 53–78.

  11. According to Exod 32 :25–29 ; Deut 10 :8–9 they were levitical priests, responsible for the scroll of the Mosaic Torah at the sanctuary (Deut 17 :8–13.18 ; 18 :1–8 ; 31 :9), cf. Reinhard Achenbach, “Von der Monarchie zur Hierokratie. Zur Geschichte der Herrschaft in der nicht-souveränen Provinz Jehud im 5.–1. Jahrhunder v. Chr.” [From Monarchy to Hierocracy : About the History of Government in the non sovereign Proinz of Yehud in the 5th – 1st century BCE], in : idem, Tora in der Perserzeit. Gesammelte Studien zu Theologie und Rechtsgeschichte Judas [Tora in the Persian Period : Collected Studies on Theology and History of Law in Judah], (Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck 2024), 1–14 (forthcoming).

  12. Editor’s note: For a discussion of Deutero-Isaiah’s role as the first clearly monotheistic depiction of Judean religion, see Kenneth Seeskin, “When Did the Bible Become Monotheistic,” TheTorah (2019).

  13. This is laid out clearly in the Babylonian creation myth known as Enuma Elish. Editor’s note: See discussion in Wayne Horowitz, “Enuma Elish: Babylonia’s Creation Myth and the Enthronement of Marduk,” TheTorah (2023).

  14. Indeed, the claim that YHWH is the Creator of light and darkness makes him even greater, since in Zoroastrian thinking, darkness is the realm of Ahura-Mazda’s counterpart, Ahriman. Editor’s note: For how the Torah responds to Zoroastrian religion, see Yishai Kiel, “How the Concept of Mosaic Authorship Developed,” TheTorah (2018).

  15. YHWH tells Moses to say this to Pharaoh again, when explaining why YHWH will distinguish Goshen, where the Israelites live, from elsewhere in Egypt, when striking the country with swarms:

    שמות ח:יח ... לְמַעַן תֵּדַע כִּי אֲנִי יְ־הוָה בְּקֶרֶב הָאָרֶץ.
    Exod 8:18 … that you may know that I YHWH am in the midst of the land.
  16. See also Exodus 9:29.

  17. Editor’s note: For a discussion of how the Torah begins as a Hexateuch before becoming a Pentateuch, see Marc Zvi Brettler, “Is the Torah a Pentateuch or Hexateuch?” TheTorah (2013).

  18. The NJPS here offers a very different and speculative translation: “When he is seated on his royal throne, he shall have a copy of this Teaching written for him on a scroll by the levitical priests.” The Law of the King is not part of the original Law of Deuteronomy, but a post-exilic text, cf. Reinhard Müller, “Königtum und Gottesherrschaft. Untersuchungen zur alttestamentlichen Monarchiekritik” [Kingship and the Reign of God: Studies on Critique against the Monarchy in the Old Testament] Forschungen zum Alten Testament 2nd series/3 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2004). Editor’s note: For more on the meaning of this law, see Cynthia Edenburg, “A King Who Reads Torah,” TheTorah (2017).

  19. See Deuteronomy 17:9,18; 18:1; 24:8; 27:9; Joshua 3:3; 8:33.

  20. This less common term, as opposed to Levitical Priests, appears also in Deuteronomy 31:9.

  21. For a closer analysis of the post-exilic scribal composition of P and non-P texts in the Book of Exodus as part of a Hexateuch and a Pentateuch cf. Reinhard Achenbach, “Die Komposition der Tora im Buch Exodus” [The Composition of the Torah in the Book of Exodus] (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2024) (forthcoming).

  22. Editor’s note: For an analysis of the Zadokite claim from a different angle, see Mark Leuchter, “How All Kohanim Became Sons of Aaron,” TheTorah (2019).

  23. Editor’s note : For more on this prophecy, see Carl Ehrlich, “Ezekiel’s Vision of God and the Chariot,” TheTorah (2019.)

  24. The legend of the death of Aaron’s firstborn sons Nadab and Abihu in Leviticus 10 is introduced together with the same measures for the purity of the high priestly ministry as formulated also in Ezekiel 44. For their parts, the scribes of Ezekiel keep a certain distance from the scribes of the Pentateuch: They never mention Moses and his Torah! At the same time, Ezekiel seems to be the Guardian of Israel and the Priestly Law (Ezekiel 33) to admonish the people, thus his relation to the expanded Pentateuch including the Holiness-Code (Lev 17–26) seems to be in some parallel to the position of Jeremiah as the Prophet in relation to Deuteronomy.

  25. Editor’s note: See discussion in Jaeyoung Jeon, “The Non-Priestly Ohel Moed,” TheTorah (2021).  

  26. Pierre Grelot, “Sur Isaie LXI : la première consécration d’un grand prêtre” [On Isaiah LXI : the first consecration of a Highpriest], Revue Biblique 97, 1990, 414–431 ; Reinhard Achenbach, “König, Priester und Prophet. Zur Transformation der Konzepte der Herrschaftslegitimation” [King, Priest, and Prophet : The Transformation of Concepts of Legitimation of Regnancy] in : idem / Martin Arneth / Eckart Otto, Tora in der Hebräischen Bibel [Torah in the Hebrew Bible], BZAR 7, (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2007), 196-145. The community around Trito-Isaiah allows proselytes to join the cult (Isaiah 56). However, the community around the tradition of Ezekiel rejects the impurities associated with the admission of uncircumcised to the Sanctuary (Ezek 44:9: “Let no alien, uncircumcised in spirit and flesh, enter My Sanctuary!”).

  27. Exodus 35–40; Leviticus 1–15; Numbers 1–10.15–19, 26–36.

  28. This blessing was found on a silver amulet in Ketef Hinnom, in what most scholars date to a 7th century context. See discussion in, Jeremy D. Smoak, The Priestly Blessing in Inscription and Scripture: The Early History of Numbers 6:24-26 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 13–16.

  29. Martin Leuenberger, Die theokratische Theologie des Psalters, in: K. Trampedach u.a., Theokratie und theokratischer Diskurs, 2013, 39-53 (on Psalm 143); Reinhard Müller, “Gotteslob mit dem Schwert? Theokratie nach Psalm 149,” in: Juhás, Theokratie, 115-149.

  30. At the same time, these reforms seem to correspond to a critical position of the high priests in Jerusalem and Samaria and the rivalry between Ptolemaics and Seleucids and their impact on the religious structures in Judah and Samaria.

  31. Indeed, according to the theology of Pg history of religion is part of a history of divine revelation, as exemplified by the change of name (Exod 6:2–8).