Levites: A Transjordanian Tribe of Priests

Pre-exilic biblical texts describe Levites as landless priests who can serve in any holy site. The origin of this status can be found in ancient times, when the tribe of Levi lost control of their territory in the Transjordan, but remained in the vicinity serving in the Nebo temple, where their ancestor Moses was buried.

APA Style

Click to copy

"Levites: A Transjordanian Tribe of Priests" (n.d.). TheTorah.com. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://www.thetorah.com/article/levites-a-transjordanian-tribe-of-priests

SBL Style

Click to copy

"Levites: A Transjordanian Tribe of Priests." TheTorah.com. Accessed October 30, 2026. https://www.thetorah.com/article/levites-a-transjordanian-tribe-of-priests.

Levites: A Transjordanian Tribe of Priests

Consecration of the Levites (detail and colorized), Jan Luyken, 1683. Rijksmuseum.nl

The Levites are a unique tribe.[1] In some texts, they are a natural unit of בני ישראל “the children of Israel.” Levi is the third son of Jacob/Israel;[2] he appears in Jacob’s final testament to his sons (Gen 49) and in Moses’ final words to the Israelites (Deut 33). The Levites are also one of the twelve tribes included in the ceremony of the blessing on the mountains of Gerizim and Ebal (Deut 27:11–13).[3]

At the same time, most biblical texts do not list Levi as one of the twelve tribes. Instead, these lists reach the number twelve by excluding Levi and dividing the Joseph tribes into Ephraim and Manasseh. Twice, when Moses takes a census of the people (Num 1–2, 26:1–51), he counts the Levites separately from the other tribes (Num 3:14–39; 26:57–62), following YHWH’s explicit command to Moses:

במדבר א:מט אַךְ אֶת מַטֵּה לֵוִי לֹא תִפְקֹד וְאֶת רֹאשָׁם לֹא תִשָּׂא בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.
Num 1:49 Do not on any account enroll the tribe of Levi or take a census of them with the Israelites.

Later the Torah explains:

במדבר כו:סב ...כִּי לֹא הָתְפָּקְדוּ בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל כִּי לֹא נִתַּן לָהֶם נַחֲלָה בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.
Num 26:62 …They were not part of the regular enrollment of the Israelites, since no share was assigned to them among the Israelites.

Instead of the Levites inheriting land as a single tribal allotment, Numbers 35:1–8 requires the Israelites to assign the Levites special cities of their own, inside their territories, and this is carried out in the book of Joshua (ch. 21).[4]

Just Priestly Attendants?

In Numbers, the Levites are chosen to be attendants in the Tabernacle, assisting the Aaronide priests.

במדבר יח:א וַיֹּאמֶר יְ־הוָה אֶל אַהֲרֹן אַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ וּבֵית אָבִיךָ אִתָּךְ תִּשְׂאוּ אֶת עֲו‍ֹן הַמִּקְדָּשׁ וְאַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ אִתָּךְ תִּשְׂאוּ אֶת עֲו‍ֹן כְּהֻנַּתְכֶם. יח:ב וְגַם אֶת אַחֶיךָ מַטֵּה לֵוִי שֵׁבֶט אָבִיךָ הַקְרֵב אִתָּךְ וְיִלָּווּ עָלֶיךָ וִישָׁרְתוּךָ וְאַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ אִתָּךְ לִפְנֵי אֹהֶל הָעֵדֻת.
Num 18:1 YHWH said to Aaron: You and your sons and the ancestral house under your charge shall bear any guilt connected with the sanctuary; you and your sons alone shall bear any guilt connected with your priesthood. 18:2 You shall also associate with yourself your kinsmen the tribe of Levi, your ancestral tribe, to be attached to you and to minister to you, while you and your sons under your charge are before the Tent of the Pact.

Each group has its own responsibilities—the priesthood offers sacrifices, and the Levites carry the Tabernacle and its accoutrements and guard it from outsiders; each also receives its own maintenance gifts—the priests receive portions of the sacrifices (Exod 29:27–28; Lev 7:14, 32–34, 10:14–15; Num 5:9, 18:8–20)[5] while the Levites receive the tithe (Num 18:21–24).[6]

This description is only found in the Priestly text of the Torah and late Second Temple texts (see appendix), and contradicts virtually every other biblical text that speaks about Levites. For one, several biblical texts speak about an entirely different class of people as temple attendants, the Gibeonites (Josh 9:23, 27) and/or the Netinim (Ezra 8:20; Neh 11:21).[7] More significantly, other accounts consistently describe the Levites as performing priestly functions.

Levites as Priests and Levitical Priests

The Deuteronomic law collection consistently refers to הַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם “Levitical priests” or הַכֹּהֲנִים בְּנֵי לֵוִי “priests, son of Levi.” For example:

דברים כא:ה וְנִגְּשׁוּ הַכֹּהֲנִים בְּנֵי לֵוִי כִּי בָם בָּחַר יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ לְשָׁרְתוֹ וּלְבָרֵךְ בְּשֵׁם יְ־הוָה וְעַל פִּיהֶם יִהְיֶה כָּל רִיב וְכָל נָגַע.
Deut 21:5 The priests, sons of Levi, shall come forward; for YHWH your God has chosen them to minister to Him and to pronounce blessing in the name of YHWH, and every lawsuit and case of assault is subject to their ruling.

Indeed, nowhere does Deuteronomy describe priests as בְּנֵי אַהֲרֹן “descendants of Aaron.”[8] In Deuteronomy, any Levite can serve as a priest, as YHWH established at Horeb,[9] though not all of them necessarily have a position at a worship site.

We find this view in other First Temple period sources. For instance, in the story of Micah’s idol, the Danites meet הַנַעַר הַלֵּוִי “the Levite lad” in the house of Micah (Judg 18:3), and when they ask him what he is doing there:

שופטים יח:ד וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם כָּזֹה וְכָזֶה עָשָׂה לִי מִיכָה וַיִּשְׂכְּרֵנִי וָאֱהִי לוֹ לְכֹהֵן.
Judg 18:4 He replied, “Thus and thus Micah did for me—he hired me and I became his priest.”

They then ask him to inquire of YHWH on their behalf, and later they steal all the cultic equipment from Micah’s house and ask the Levite to come be the priest for their new city:

שופטים יח:יט ...וְלֵךְ עִמָּנוּ וֶהְיֵה לָנוּ לְאָב וּלְכֹהֵן הֲטוֹב הֱיוֹתְךָ כֹהֵן לְבֵית אִישׁ אֶחָד אוֹ הֱיוֹתְךָ כֹהֵן לְשֵׁבֶט וּלְמִשְׁפָּחָה בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל.
Judg 18:19 …Come with us and be our father and priest. Would you rather be priest to one man’s household or be priest to a tribe and clan in Israel?

Thus, pre-exilic texts present the Levites as priests of YHWH who could potentially be hired anywhere.[10]

Vulnerable Levites

A Levite who had not secured a position at a specific worship site, however, would have been economically at risk. This explains why Deuteronomy includes Levites among the people to whom Israelites must give charity:

דברים יד:כז וְהַלֵּוִי אֲשֶׁר בִּשְׁעָרֶיךָ לֹא תַעַזְבֶנּוּ כִּי אֵין לוֹ חֵלֶק וְנַחֲלָה עִמָּךְ.
Deut 14:27 Do not neglect the Levite in your community, for he has no hereditary portion as you have.

A Levite with no land and no steady income of gifts from serving at an altar was vulnerable in the same way as the widow or the stranger.[11]

In the hundreds of years that the Levites lived among the Israelites and served at local altars, they did not all become part of established priestly houses, nor did they assimilate into the tribes where they lived. How did the Levites reach their curious position in Israelite society: ideal priests who lacked territory and were economically vulnerable?

The Levites and Their Territory

Originally, the Levites were a tribe with their own territory, part of the subgroup which included the first four sons of Leah: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah.[12] Julius Wellhausen argued that these four tribes were an early unit, settled on the two sides of the Dead Sea.[13] We know that Simeon and Judah settled to the west and Reuben to the east. Levi’s territory, I would argue, was also in the east.

Moses, the great Levite ancestor figure, is buried in the Transjordanian mishor, in the region of Mount Nebo (Deut 34). Just as Rachel’s tomb can be found in the territory of Benjamin (1 Sam 10:2), Joseph’s in the territory of Manasseh (Josh 24:32), and Joshua’s in the territory of Ephraim (Josh 24:30), so too Moses’ tomb would have been located in the territory of Levi.[14]

The Levites Lose their Territory

If Levi once occupied the area around Nebo, by the time the first tribal divisions texts are written, this was no longer the case.[15] In the earliest descriptions we have, Reuben occupies this territory (Num 32:38).

While we have no text that describes a battle between Reuben and Levi, it is conspicuous that the early, pre-Priestly account of Israelite rebellion against Moses’ authority features Reubenites as the ring leaders: Datan and Abiram (Num 16).[16] This story may be based on a memory of an ancient conflict between these tribes.[17] If so, from the perspective of land, the Reubenites won.

Soon after this, however, the Gadites expanded their territorial holdings and took the land from the Reubenites.[18] This is reflected in the blessing of Gad at the end of Deuteronomy:

דברים לג:כ בָּרוּךְ מַרְחִיב גָּד כְּלָבִיא שָׁכֵן וְטָרַף זְרוֹעַ אַף קָדְקֹד. לג:כא וַיַּרְא רֵאשִׁית לוֹ כִּי שָׁם חֶלְקַת מְחֹקֵק סָפוּן וַיֵּתֵא רָאשֵׁי עָם צִדְקַת יְ־הוָה עָשָׂה וּמִשְׁפָּטָיו עִם יִשְׂרָאֵל.
Deut 33:20 Blessed be He who enlarges Gad! Poised is he like a lion to tear off arm and scalp. 33:21 He chose for himself the best, for there is the paneled plot of the lawgiver, and he gathered the heads of the people. He executed YHWH’s righteousness and His decisions for Israel.

This poem, which should be dated to 9th century B.C.E., notes that Gad is now in control of the area where Moses, “the lawgiver,” is buried.[19] Given that Levi’s territory passed first to Reuben and then to Gad, what happened to the Levites themselves? The answer is connected to the status of Nebo.

The Origin of this Levitical Status

The area of Nebo was not only the burial place of Moses, but, as we know from the Mesha inscription, it housed a YHWH Temple. As the importance of this temple was likely tied up with the identity if its patron saint, Moses, who was buried either in it or alongside it, the Levites were able to remain in their territory not as sovereigns, but as priests serving the Nebo temple.

This is supported by the poem noted above, which appears to be a hieros logos or “sacred founding legend” for the temple at Moses’ gravesite.[20] The section of the blessing Levi[21] explains why the Levites were chosen as its priests:

דברים לג:ח וּלְלֵוִי אָמַר תֻּמֶּיךָ וְאוּרֶיךָ לְאִישׁ חֲסִידֶךָ אֲשֶׁר נִסִּיתוֹ בְּמַסָּה תְּרִיבֵהוּ עַל מֵי מְרִיבָה. לג:ט הָאֹמֵר לְאָבִיו וּלְאִמּוֹ לֹא רְאִיתִיו וְאֶת אֶחָיו לֹא הִכִּיר וְאֶת (בנו) [בָּנָיו] לֹא יָדָע כִּי שָׁמְרוּ אִמְרָתֶךָ וּבְרִיתְךָ יִנְצֹרוּ.
Deut 33:8 And of Levi he said: Let your Tummim and Urim be with your faithful one, whom you tested at Massah, challenged at the waters of Meribah; 33:9 Who said of his father and mother, “I consider them not.” His brothers he disregarded, ignored his own children. Your precepts alone they observed, and kept Your covenant.

According to this, the reward YHWH grants the Levites for the loyalty they showed at Masah u-Meribah[22] is that they should be given control of the holy objects, the Urim ve-Tummim, with which the Levites will be able to communicate with YHWH and provide the people with oracles. The text continues:

דברים לג:י יוֹרוּ מִשְׁפָּטֶיךָ לְיַעֲקֹב וְתוֹרָתְךָ לְיִשְׂרָאֵל יָשִׂימוּ קְטוֹרָה בְּאַפֶּךָ וְכָלִיל עַל מִזְבְּחֶךָ. לג:יא בָּרֵךְ יְ־הוָה חֵילוֹ וּפֹעַל יָדָיו תִּרְצֶה מְחַץ מָתְנַיִם קָמָיו וּמְשַׂנְאָיו מִן יְקוּמוּן.
Deut 33:10 They shall teach your laws to Jacob and your instructions to Israel. They shall place incense before your nostrils and whole-offerings on your altar. 33:11 Bless, O YHWH, his substance, and favor his undertakings. Smite the loins of his foes; let his enemies rise no more.

Here the text adds two further features of the Levites’ place in Israelite society: They teach YHWH’s laws and they offer sacrifices. In short, the Levites are to act as Israel’s priests, communicating God’s laws and oracles, and offering sacrifices on their behalf.[23]

Defenders of YHWH

An alternative version of the tradition reflected in this blessing appears as part of the Golden Calf story in Exodus 32. When Moses comes down from the mountain, having learned of the sin of the Golden Calf, he calls out to ask who is with him on the side of YHWH, וַיֵּאָסְפוּ אֵלָיו כָּל בְּנֵי לֵוִי “and all the Levites gathered to him” (Exod 32:26) Moses then instructs them to strike down all the sinners, and they do so, leaving 3,000 Israelites dead.

שמות לב:כט וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה מִלְאוּ יֶדְכֶם הַיּוֹם לַי־הוָה כִּי אִישׁ בִּבְנוֹ וּבְאָחִיו וְלָתֵת עֲלֵיכֶם הַיּוֹם בְּרָכָה.
Exod 32:29 And Moses said, “Dedicate yourselves to YHWH this day—for each of you has been against son and brother—that He may bestow a blessing upon you today.”

In this story, the Levites are granted their status as a gift from Moses after showing their loyalty to YHWH in battle.

Descendants of Moses

Elsewhere, the connection of Levites to Moses is made genealogically. In the Micah story, the priesthood in Dan is said to descend from Moses:

שופטים יח:ל וַיָּקִימוּ לָהֶם בְּנֵי דָן אֶת הַפָּסֶל וִיהוֹנָתָן בֶּן גֵּרְשֹׁם בֶּן מְנַשֶּׁה הוּא וּבָנָיו הָיוּ כֹהֲנִים לְשֵׁבֶט הַדָּנִי עַד יוֹם גְּלוֹת הָאָרֶץ.
Judg 18:30 The Danites set up the sculptured image for themselves; and Jonathan son of Gershom son of (Manasseh) [Moses], and his descendants, served as priests to the Danite tribe until the land went into exile.

The Hebrew text as we have it now adds a nun into the name of Moses, turning it into Manasseh, but the Masoretic scribes put this nun into superscript to inform the reader that it isn’t original. Clearly, it was added to avoid stating explicitly that Jonathan, this Levite of questionable character, was Moses’ grandson, but the attempt is half-hearted. The name of Jonathan’s father, Gershom, makes the point clear. Moreover, this correction is absent in many LXX manuscripts, and it is ignored in the Latin Vulgate.[24] While the story is meant to lampoon this worship site, it is clear that part of Jonathan’s bona fides as a Levite is his descent from the greatest of all Levite ancestors, Moses.

A Transjordanian Tribe

Over time, Levite becomes synonymous with priesthood. But serving in one temple was not enough work for one tribe. Thus, after Levi lost control of their territory, many Levites began to wander into the territory of other Israelite tribes.

With their reputations as the tribe of Moses, teachers of YHWH’s laws, and diviners of YHWH’s plans, they were the perfect group to choose for service in local shrines. This is likely how Levites ended up as far away as Dan, and probably other places as well. Nevertheless, unlike in Nebo and the Transjordan, their natural home as priests, in Cisjordan, the Levites had to find places that would take them in.

Their situation took a turn for the worse in the 9th century B.C.E., when King Mesha of Moab conquered the Mishor and destroyed the YHWH Temple in Nebo. Mesha described this conquest in his stele:

ויאמר לי כמש לך אחז את נבה על ישראל. ואהלך בללה ואלתחם בה מבקע השחרת עד הצהרם ואחזה, ואהרג כלה, שבעת אלפן גברן וגרן וגברת וגרת ורחמת כי לעשתר כמש החרמתה. ואקח משם א[ת כ]לי י־הוה ואסחבהם לפני כמש.
And Kemosh (=the Moabite god) said to me: “Go take Nebo from Israel!” And I went in the night and I fought against it from the break of dawn until noon, and I took it and I killed everyone, seven thousand men and boys and women and girls and servant girls, for I had put it to the ban for Ashtar-Kemosh. And I took the [ves]sels of YHWH from there and hauled them before the face of Kemosh.

Having lost their main temple, a new wave of Levites probably entered the Cisjordanian territory during this period, looking for holy sites where they could ply their trade. This wave may have inspired the laws we eventually find in Deuteronomy requiring Israelites to take care of unemployed Levites living in their territory.

In the early 8th century, Kings Joash and Jeroboam II of Israel recaptured the Mishor. In this period, it seems to have again been part of Reuben and not Gad (and certainly not Levi).[25] We do not know whether the temple was reestablished at this time, but even if it was, soon thereafter (734–732 B.C.E.), King Tiglath-pilesar III of Assyria, conquered and destroyed Israelite Transjordan, marking the permanent end of Israelite domination of this region.

Any surviving Levites would have fled to the Cisjordan at this point, and after the destruction of the rest of Israel in 722 B.C.E., to Judah, joining their brother Levites either as priests in local worship sites, controlled by other priestly families, or as landless objects of charity.

The Decline of the Levites

By the Second Temple period, the Priestly authors gave the Levites a role as attendants in the Jerusalem Temple, and included a required Israelite tithe as their stipend; this was the final rung on the centuries-long decline of this tribe.

In the pre-monarchic period, they were a landholding tribe, with an ancestor figure and a temple of great importance. After that, they became a landless tribe but still with a temple, then a landless and temple-less tribe, looking for work as local priests. This development put them in competition with other Priestly families with different ancestors, such as the Aaronites and the Zadokites, so the Levites were eventually forced to accept a status as priestly attendants.

And yet, when we read the blessing of Levi in Deuteronomy 33, we can hear the echoes of their former greatness, when their loyalty to YHWH brought them into military conflict with their fellow Israelites, and they were rewarded with YHWH’s priesthood in the Nebo temple, that was to stand by the tomb of their ancestor Moses.

Appendix

Demotion of Levites

Scholars continue to debate how the Levites got demoted from priests to priestly attendants serving under the Aaronide priesthood.[26]

Centralization

Julius Wellhausen argued that was a result of the centralization of worship.[27] At one point, different families of Levitical priests served in different holy sites, but when Josiah centralized worship, the only family that remained was the Aaronides of Jerusalem. As they refused to let any other priestly family join their ranks, the now unemployed Levites from other worship sites needed to strike a deal with the Jerusalem Temple, which they did by taking the lower role of attendants.

As many scholars have noted, this suggestion doesn’t fit the sources describing the early Second Temple period. According to Ezra 2:36–39 (=Neh 7:39–42), 4,289 priests from four different priestly families returned from exile, and three more families of “possible” priestly lineage on top of these (Ezra 2:61–63 [=Neh 7:62–64]). In contrast, only 74 Levites returned (Ezra 2:40 [=Neh 7:43]). The huge number of priests in comparison with that of the Levites makes little sense if Levites represented the priesthood of every holy place other than Jerusalem.

Moreover, the centralization of worship under Josiah took place only a few decades before the exile, which is hardly enough time for the creation of solid boundaries between priestly families and Levitical families. Finally, the description of the centralization process implies that only the actual priests who served in high places would be disqualified from active service (2 Kgs 23:9); the text says nothing about their descendants losing priestly status for all time.[28]

Israelite Versus Judahite

A different theory, put forward separately by Aelred Cody and Menahem Haran, is that Levites were the priestly class of Israel in the north and kohanim (priests) were the priestly class of Judah in the south.[29] According to this model, when Israel was destroyed by Assyria in 722 B.C.E., many Levites escaped south to Judah. They were not accepted into the ranks of the local priesthood, so they accepted a lesser role.

Support for this view can be found in the list of Levitical cities (Josh 21:1–40; 1 Chron 6:39–66), since the Aaronide priests received cities among the southern tribes of Judah, Simeon, and Benjamin—i.e., the territory of the kingdom of Judah—while the rest of the Levites received cities elsewhere, in the north and east. But these texts are very late and artificial; they assume the perspective on priests and Levites found in the Priestly texts which, as already noted, contradict the First Temple period material about Levites.

In fact, non-Priestly material suggests that Levites lived throughout Greater Israel, in the north and the south. The priest who serves Micah is from Bethlehem (Judg 17:7), and is respected by the coastal Danites (Judg 18:3–4), who bring him and his descendants to live in the far north (Judg 18:30). The Levite protagonist of the concubine in Gibeah story in Ephraimite, though he travels back and forth to Judah (Judg 19:1). Moreover, according to Kings, the north made use of non-Levitical priests (1 Kgs 12:31), such that it is hard to say that the northern kingdom was the source of their status.

As for the Aaronides, nowhere in the Bible is Aaron tied to Jerusalem. Instead, Aaron is buried in the Transjordan on Mount Hor (Num 21:22–29, 33:38) or Moserah (Deut 10:6),[30] and his son Eleazar and his grandson Phinehas are buried in the Ephraimite Hills (Josh 24:33). Moreover, the story of Aaron building the Golden Calf (Exod 32) is a polemic aimed at Jeroboam’s calves in Dan and Bethel (1 Kgs 12:26–30).[31] And in war against Benjamin, Phinehas is serving as priest in Bethel (Judg 20:26–28). Thus, if anything, the Aaronides are tied to the north, not the south.[32]

View Footnotes

Published 2021-09-27

  1. This article is an adaptation of Part Two of, Alexander Rofé, “ברכת משה, מקדש נבו ושאלת מוצא הלויים” [Moses’ Blessing, the Sanctuary at Nebo, and the History of the Levites], inמחקרים במקרא ובמזרח הקדמון מוגשים לשמואל א׳ ליונשטם במלאת לו שבעים שנה [Studies in the Bible and the Ancient Near East Presented to Samuel E. Loewenstamm on his Seventieth Birthday], ed. Yitschak Avishur and Joshua Blau (Jerusalem: E. Rubinstein’s Pub. House, 1978), 409–424; reprinted in Alexander Rofé, מבוא לספר דברים: חלק ראשון ופרקי המשך [Introduction to Deuteronomy: Part I and Further Chapters] (Jerusalem: Akademon, 1988), 234–249. It was translated, edited, and adapted for TheTorah.com by the editors with the author’s permission and input. For an adaption of Part One, see Alexander Rofé, “YHWH Is Enthroned at Gad’s Temple: The Site of Moses’ Tomb,” TheTorah (2020).

  2. Levi and his sons even appear in the list of the twelve children of Israel in Genesis 46:8–27, a text that looks much like a list of tribal clans.

  3. The name Levi is likely envisioned as one of the twelve names to be carved into the high priest’s ephod and breastplate (Exod 28:9–11, 21; 39:6, 14). The text never says which twelve names, but as it mentions they should be carved כְּתוֹלְדֹתָם “according to their birth order,” this implies it means Israel’s literal sons and not the other conception of the twelve tribes, which excludes Levi.

  4. Indeed, in the long description of the division of the land in Joshua 13–19, each of the twelve tribes is given a plot, and the Levites are not one of the twelve.

  5. It seems like that they also receive the portion of the produce grown yearly that is donated to YHWH (Num 15:17–21). Certainly, this is how the rabbis understood the passage, which is the origin of what they call terumah gedolah.

  6. The Levites themselves must give a portion of this to the priests as a tithe from the tithe (Num 18:25–32). The rabbis call this terumat maʿaser.

  7. See discussion of this group in Menahem Haran, “הגבעונים, הנתינים, ועבדי שלמה: היסטוריה של קיבוץ כנעני ביהודה” [The Gibeonites, the Nethinim, and the Servants of Solomon: The History of a Canaanite Enclave in Judah], in יהודה וירושלים: הכינוס הארצי השנים־עשר לידיעת הארץ [Judah and Jerusalem: The Twelfth Archaeological Convention] (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1957), 37–45.

  8. This was already noted in the early days of biblical source criticism in the 19th century.

  9. דברים י:ח בָּעֵת הַהִוא הִבְדִּיל יְ־הוָה אֶת שֵׁבֶט הַלֵּוִי לָשֵׂאת אֶת אֲרוֹן בְּרִית יְ־הוָה לַעֲמֹד לִפְנֵי יְ־הוָה לְשָׁרְתוֹ וּלְבָרֵךְ בִּשְׁמוֹ עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה. י:ט עַל כֵּן לֹא הָיָה לְלֵוִי חֵלֶק וְנַחֲלָה עִם אֶחָיו יְ־הוָה הוּא נַחֲלָתוֹ כַּאֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ לוֹ.
    Deut 10:8 At that time YHWH set apart the tribe of Levi to carry the Ark of the YHWH’s Covenant, to stand in attendance upon YHWH, and to bless in His name, as is still the case. 10:9 That is why the Levites have received no hereditary portion along with their kinsmen: YHWH is their portion, as YHWH your God spoke concerning them.
  10. Editor’s note: See discussion in, Mark Leuchter, “Who Were the Levites?” TheTorah (2017); Baruch A. Levine, “The Meaning of Degel and the Elusive History of the Levites,” TheTorah (2014).

  11. This conception lies behind the threat YHWH makes against the family of Eli, after promising that he will choose someone else to be the chief priest for Israel’s anointed king:

    שמואל א ב:לו וְהָיָה כָּל הַנּוֹתָר בְּבֵיתְךָ יָבוֹא לְהִשְׁתַּחֲו‍ֹת לוֹ לַאֲגוֹרַת כֶּסֶף וְכִכַּר לָחֶם וְאָמַר סְפָחֵנִי נָא אֶל אַחַת הַכְּהֻנּוֹת לֶאֱכֹל פַּת לָחֶם.
    1 Sam 2:36 And all the survivors of your house shall come and bow low to him for the sake of a money fee and a loaf of bread, and shall say, “Please, assign me to one of the priestly functions, that I may have a morsel of bread to eat.”

    According to this passage, a Levite without an assigned altar or worship site would find himself in penury.

  12. The account of the birth of the sons of Jacob in Genesis 29:32–35 tells of the birth of her first four sons—Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah—and then says that she stopped giving birth for a while. Later (Gen 30:17–21), after she trades mandrakes for a night with Jacob, she conceives again, first Issachar then Zebulon (and afterwards Dinah, though she does not become a tribe). This narrative distinction between the first four sons and the last two sons likely masks a historical distinction, with the last two tribes joining the Leah group later in history. It also reflects a geographical distinction, since Issachar and Zebulon are in the northern valleys and the Galilee respectively.

  13. Julius Wellhausen, Prolegomena to the History of Ancient Israel, trans. J. Sutherland Black and Allan Menzies, introduction by W. Robertson Smith (Edinburgh: A. & C. Black, 1885), 121–157; trans. from, Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1883 [reprint of Geschichte Israels, 1878]), 144.

  14. Another piece of supporting evidence for this comes from a comment in the book of Chronicles about Levites in the time of David:

    דברי הימים א כו:לא לַחֶבְרוֹנִי חֲשַׁבְיָהוּ וְאֶחָיו בְּנֵי חַיִל אֶלֶף וּשְׁבַע מֵאוֹת עַל פְּקֻדַּת יִשְׂרָאֵל מֵעֵבֶר לַיַּרְדֵּן מַעְרָבָה לְכֹל מְלֶאכֶת יְ־הוָה וְלַעֲבֹדַת הַמֶּלֶךְ. כו:לא לַחֶבְרוֹנִי יְרִיָּה הָרֹאשׁ לַחֶבְרוֹנִי לְתֹלְדֹתָיו לְאָבוֹת בִּשְׁנַת הָאַרְבָּעִים לְמַלְכוּת דָּוִיד נִדְרָשׁוּ וַיִּמָּצֵא בָהֶם גִּבּוֹרֵי חַיִל בְּיַעְזֵיר גִּלְעָד. כו:לב וְאֶחָיו בְּנֵי חַיִל אַלְפַּיִם וּשְׁבַע מֵאוֹת רָאשֵׁי הָאָבוֹת וַיַּפְקִידֵם דָּוִיד הַמֶּלֶךְ עַל הָראוּבֵנִי וְהַגָּדִי וַחֲצִי שֵׁבֶט הַמְנַשִּׁי לְכָל דְּבַר הָאֱלֹהִים וּדְבַר הַמֶּלֶךְ.
    1 Chron 26:30 The Hebronites: Hashabiah and his brothers, capable men, 1700, supervising Israel on the west side of the Jordan in all matters of YHWH and the service of the king. 26:31 The Hebronites: Jeriah, the chief of the Hebronites -- they were investigated in the fortieth year of David's reign by clans of all their lines, and men of substance were found among them in Jazer-gilead. 26:32 His brothers, able men, 2700, chiefs of clans -- David put them in charge of the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh in all matters of God and matters of the king.

    While this is admittedly from a Persian period text, the historical note here does not appear to be part of a rethinking of the priest/Levite divide, but a random nugget likely taken from an older source. If so, then we hear that at least some Levites are from the area of Jazer in the Transjordan.

  15. That the Levites once had land but were scattered is also implied by the Jacob’s deathbed curse:

    בראשית מט:ה שִׁמְעוֹן וְלֵוִי אַחִים כְּלֵי חָמָס מְכֵרֹתֵיהֶם. מט:ו בְּסֹדָם אַל תָּבֹא נַפְשִׁי בִּקְהָלָם אַל תֵּחַד כְּבֹדִי כִּי בְאַפָּם הָרְגוּ אִישׁ וּבִרְצֹנָם עִקְּרוּ שׁוֹר. מט:ז אָרוּר אַפָּם כִּי עָז וְעֶבְרָתָם כִּי קָשָׁתָה אֲחַלְּקֵם בְּיַעֲקֹב וַאֲפִיצֵם בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל.
    Gen 49:5 Simeon and Levi are a pair; Their weapons are tools of lawlessness. 49:6 Let not my person be included in their council, Let not my being be counted in their assembly. For when angry they slay men, And when pleased they maim oxen. 49:7 Cursed be their anger so fierce, And their wrath so relentless. I will divide them in Jacob, Scatter them in Israel.

    Here the explanation for their landlessness, related in some way to the story of Dinah and Shechem in Genesis 34, is negative, painting the Levites (and Simeonites) in a criminal light. Clearly, the texts that talk about Levi gaining the priesthood take the opposite perspective on Levi’s military past, but at the same time, they are attempting to explain the same phenomenon of Levitical landlessness.

  16. While in the Torah as we have it now, their story is intertwined with that of the 250 Israelite leaders, plus Korah and the Levites, source critics have long noted that these are two separate stories, and that the Datan and Abiram one is from a non-Priestly source. Editor’s note: For a discussion of how the story divides up into sources/redactions, see TABS Editors, “Korah, Datan and Abiram: A Case Study for the Methods of Academic Biblical Studies,” TheTorah (2014).

  17. Editor’s note: For an argument that this dispute took place not in the wilderness but in the land itself, see David Frankel, “Datan and Abiram: A Rebellion of the Shepherds in the Land of Israel,” TheTorah (2016).

  18. Editor’s note: For another discussion of the shifting territory of Reuben and Gad, see Yigal Levin, “What Were Reuben and Gad’s Territories in the Transjordan?” TheTorah (2017).

  19. For the date of Deuteronomy 33, see Rofé, “YHWH is Enthroned at Gad’s Temple,” n. 20.

  20. See my “YHWH Is Enthroned at Gad’s Temple.”

  21. Editor’s note: For an argument that this part of the text is a later addition, see Andrew Tobolowsky, “Did Israel Always Have Twelve Tribes,” TheTorah (2020). For an argument that the list of blessings was once separate from the framing, see Tzemah Yoreh, “‘Moses Wrote Down This Song,’ Deuteronomy 31:22—Which Song?” TheTorah (2018).

  22. Apparently, the poem has a different version of the story of Levi’s loyalty, since in Exodus 32, it occurs neat Mount Horeb, not in Massah u-Meribah, which is where the water miracle takes place (Exod 17).

  23. The blessing of Levi ends with the hope that their enemies will no longer be able to hurt them, implying that Levi has suffered defeats in the past. This may be an oblique reference to their displacement by Reuben.

  24. For a discussion of whether the change to Manasseh has any significance beyond just making the name not that of Moses, see Steve Weitzman, “Reopening the Case of the Suspiciously Suspended Nun in Judges 18:30,” The Catholic Bible Quarterly 61.3 (1999): 448–460.

  25. Joshua 13:20, which likely describes the situation in this later period, lists Ashdot-hapisgah as part of Reuben.

  26. Editor’s note: For some discussions of this question, see Mark Leuchter, “How All Kohanim Became Sons of Aaron,” TheTorah (2019); David Frankel, “The Flowering Staff: Proof of Aaron’s or the Levites’ Election?,” TheTorah (2019); Ely Levine, “The Historical Circumstances that Inspired the Korah Narrative,” TheTorah (2015); Adele Berlin, “The Levite Rebellion against the Priesthood: Why They Were Demoted,” TheTorah (2013).

  27. Wellhausen, Prolegomena to the History of Ancient Israel, 121–157.

  28. For detailed criticism of Wellhausen’s idea, see Wolf W. Baudissin, Die Geschichte des alttesamentlichen Priesterthums (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1889); Yehezekel Kaufmann, תולדות האמונה הישראלית [The History of Israelite Faith] (Tel Aviv: Bialik, 1937–1948), 1.160–184; Moshe Greenberg, “A New Approach to the History of the Israelite Priesthood,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 70 (1950): 41–47.

  29. Aelred Cody, A History of Old Testament Priesthood, Analecta Biblica 35 (Rome: Pontifical Institute, 1969), 158–166; Menahem Haran, “הכהנים והלויים” [The Priests and the Levites], in idem, תקופות ומוסדות במקרא: עיונים היסטוריים [Periods and Institutions in the Bible: Historical Inquiries] (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 1972), 137–200; idem, “The Priesthood and the Tribe of Levi” in Menahem Haran, Temples and Temple Service in Ancient Israel: An Inquiry into Biblical Cult Phenomena and the Historical Setting of the Priestly School (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1985 [repr. of, Oxford: Clarendon, 1978]), 58-111 (= ch. 4).

  30. Editor’s note: For a discussion of this tradition, see Mark Leuchter and Zev Farber, “Pre-Biblical Aaron, Miriam, and Moses,” TheTorah (2020).

  31. Editor’s note: See discussion in Frederick E. Greenspahn, “Reading the Golden Calves of Sinai and Northern Israel in Context,” TheTorah (2015). For a different take on the relationship between the texts, see Nathan MacDonald, “The Golden Calf: A Post-Exilic Message of Forgiveness,” TheTorah (2021).

  32. As difficult as it is to find any territorial difference between Levites and priests in pre-Priestly sources, it is just as difficult to find any different in their tasks. Max Weber (Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionsoziologie, III Das Antike Judentum [Tübingen: Mohr, 1923], 188–189) argued that they were in charge of promulgating ritual laws in contrast to the secular statutes, yet it is hard to see how any of these things would distinguish them from priests. (See discussion in, Joachim Begrich, “Die priesterliche Tora,” in Werden und Wesen des Alten Testaments, ed. Johannes Hempel, Friedrich Stummer, and Paul Volz, BZAW 66 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1936), 63–88. Similarly, Gerhard von Rad (Studies in Deuteronomy, Studies in Biblical Theology 9 [London: SCM Press, 1953], 11–16) argued that the Levites were popular preachers in the periphery, and Benjamin Mazar (“ערי הלויים והכהנים” [The Cities of the Levites and Priests], אנציקלופדיה מקראית [Encyclopaedia Biblica] 4 ]Jerusalem: Bialik, 1971], 478–485), in contrast, that they were administrative officials. Both of these positions rely on texts composed in the Second Temple period and cannot be taken as sources for pre-exilic reality.

Related Topics:LevitesKohanim