Who Was Balaam’s God: YHWH El? Or Bull El?

APA Style

Click to copy

"Who Was Balaam’s God: YHWH El? Or Bull El?" (n.d.). TheTorah.com. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://www.thetorah.com/article/who-was-balaams-god-yhwh-el-or-bull-el

SBL Style

Click to copy

"Who Was Balaam’s God: YHWH El? Or Bull El?." TheTorah.com. Accessed October 30, 2026. https://www.thetorah.com/article/who-was-balaams-god-yhwh-el-or-bull-el.

Who Was Balaam’s God: YHWH El? Or Bull El?

Stele of El. From James Prictchard, Ancient Near Eastern Pictures Relating to the Old Testament (1969). Courtesy of Bruce K. Satterfield

The Torah Portion of Balaam

“Who wrote the Bible?” This is not only the title of a best-selling popular book about the documentary hypothesis[1] but an old question addressed already by the rabbis in the Talmud (b. Bava Batra 14b):

משה כתב ספרו, ופרשת בלעם, ואיוב.
Moses wrote ‘his book,’ the Portion of Balaam, and (the Book of) Job.

Explaining the odd line about the portion of Balaam being an independent composition, Rashi writes:

ופרשת בלעם – נבואתו ומשליו אף על פי שאינן צורכי משה ותורתו וסדר מעשיו
And the portion of Balaam – his prophecies and proverbs, even though they do not reflect the purposes of Moses, nor his Torah nor the narratives of his deeds.

Even though Rashi, explaining the Talmud, maintains the traditional view that Moshe wrote the prophecies and proverbs of Balaam and placed them in the Torah, he still views these statements and proverbs of Balaam as originating independently of both the opening narrative of the parasha as well of the rest of the Torah.

This approach to the proverbs of Balaam has its advocates among contemporary academic scholars as well. In his Anchor Bible Numbers commentary, Professor Baruch Levine concludes, “[W]hat is eminently clear is that the poems speak for themselves, and that the narratives are predicated upon a different casting of Balaam.”[2]

Following Levine and Rashi, this piece will focus on the understanding Balaam’s poems as independent and foreign to the larger narrative context and uncovering their meaning.

God and El

For the purpose of this exercise, let’s focus on a single verse, a refrain, actually, that occurs twice in our parasha (Num. 23:22; repeated in Num. 24:8, albeit with a small variation):

אֵל מוֹצִיאָם מִמִּצְרָיִם כְּתוֹעֲפֹת רְאֵם לוֹ.
God who freed them from Egypt is for them like the horns of the wild ox (NJPS).

The traditional understanding of the word אל in the poem as a reference to God, i.e, “the One True God.” This is hardly surprising; that is the general meaning of the word in the Bible. However, biblical scholars have long understood that אל is also the proper name of the old chief god in the ancient Canaanite pantheon, El (or Il). The name “Yisra-El” actually contains the theophoric (divine) element, El, which strongly implies that the people of Israel worshiped El during their formative period.

Thus, it is highly likely that, in its original context, the verses we have selected did not look to the generic “God” as the author of Israel’s Exodus from Egyptian slavery, but the god El.[3] If this is correct, we ought to translate our verse as “El brought them/him out of Egypt; like the horns of a wild ox does he have!” Particularly noteworthy is the fact that El’s general epithet was “Bull.”

The Bible itself repeatedly demonstrates that ancient Israelites either acknowledged the existence of, or outright worshipped, more than one god/God, and that, eventually, some of these gods coalesced in the minds of the Israelites into the one God of Israel familiar from the Bible and later Judaism.[4]

Professor Mark Smith of New York University has long studied the process through which the various gods and goddesses that were worshipped in the Bronze and Iron Ages gradually became identified as the God of Israel.[5] Smith calls this process one of convergence, as gods like El came to be identified as identical with YHWH; [6] and differentiation, as certain other gods and aspects of their worship came to be rejected as “Canaanite,” and so, excluded from “authorized” Israelite worship.

Balaam and El: The Evidence from Deir ‘Alla

Deir-Alla Inscription, 750–700 BCE

Returning to the character of Balaam, this figure is not only a character in the Bible but is known from extra-biblical literature as well, specifically in what are known as the Deir ‘Alla inscriptions. Deir ‘Alla is a site east of the Jordan river where, in 1967, archaeologists discovered a series of temple-inscriptions that mention a “seer of the gods” named Balaam son of Beor. Remarkably, the ancient texts depict a prophet very similar to the biblical figure from our Torah portion:

This is the account of Balaam, son of Beor, who was a seer of the gods. The gods came to him in the night, and he saw a vision according to the oracle of El. Then they spoke to Balaam son of Beor: “This he will do… in the future”… And Balaam arose on the next day… and he wept bitterly…[7]

The similarity between the above and some of the key lines that introduce Balaam’s prophecies in the parasha are striking:

נְאֻם בִּלְעָם בְּנוֹ בְעֹר וּנְאֻם הַגֶּבֶר שְׁתֻם הָעָיִן‏: נְאֻם שֹׁמֵעַ אִמְרֵי־ אֵל…
Word of Balaam son of Beor, Word of the man whose eye is true, Word of him who hears the statements of El… (Numbers 24:3–4; see also 24:15).

Both the ancient inscriptions and the Book of Numbers regard the figure of Balaam as a messenger of the god El.

Learning about God from Balaam and El

Considering the above evidence both internal to the Bible as well as in comparison with other Ancient Near Eastern texts, it seems clear that the simple meaning of Balaam’s statement was that Bull El—his god and the old chief of the Canaanite pantheon—took Israel out of Egypt. The Canaanite texts excavated at Ugarit describe El in such terms as “Bull El his father”; “King, Father of Years”; and “the kindly One, El the Compassionate.”[8]

If the original referent of the verse in Balaam’s prophecy was really El, how are we to make this surprising pre-monotheistic expression of thanks to a deity “Torah”? As Professor Uriel Simon of Bar Ilan University put it so eloquently, “What is the religious significance of the peshat?”[9]

Maimonides and the Philosopher’s God

To address this question, I will begin with an unlikely source: the beginning of Maimonides’ great composition, the Mishneh Torah.

יסוד היסודות ועמוד החכמות לידע שיש שם מצוי ראשון והוא ממציא כל הנמצא.
The foundation of foundations and the pillar of wisdoms is to know that there is a Prime Existence who brought into existence everything that exists.[10]

Maimonides attempts here to describe God without epithets of any kind, in as dispassionate a formulation that he can possibly muster in what he considered to be a popular medium.[11] Typically, we encounter Maimonidean-type depictions of God in such hymns as Adon Olam:

והוא היה, והוא הוה, והוא יהיה בתפארה.
[God] was, is and will be — in glory.

Were we to reflect on these descriptions of God—we often sing these hymns by rote without thinking about their meaning—we would probably agree with them as theological reflections. Nevertheless, it is doubtful that many of us would pray using them, especially in an hour of great need or trauma. Rather, when our needs are greatest, we typically think of God in more descriptive or passionate terms:

אנא, בעל הרחמים
אבינו שבשמים
אבינו מלכינו
I beseech You, Master of Mercy
Our Father in Heaven
Our Father our King

When we feel our most passionate about prayer, we more naturally gravitate towards thinking about God in more compassionate, and less philosophical, terms — despite any consideration of theological truths. While we have long passed the time when we would consider “praying to El” as a separate divine entity, the imagery associated with God in these prayers resonates much more with the mythic descriptions of El than they do with Maimonides dispassionate descriptions of an unmoved mover.

Multiple Ways of Describing God

As modern scholarship and the biblical text both demonstrate, the convergence between YHWH and El in the minds of ancient Israelites already took place in biblical times. Nonetheless, we still have things we can learn about God, and about ourselves, as we pause to consider how our forebears in Israelite antiquity imaged God, and we can appreciate the ingenuity that they brought to their efforts to understand God, to worship God — and to describe God.

As Rabbi Neil Gillman has taught, all (or at least most) “God-talk” is metaphorical.[12] People tend to describe God in whatever way resonates with them most deeply. The God of Israel is one, but the images of God are many. Some of these images go back to the god El, referenced by the Aramean prophet Balaam and transcribed by the Israelite prophet Moses. These images still have their resonances in the biblical text and in Jewish prayers, where we turn to our father, the merciful one, to save us in times of need, as he once did when he took us out of Egypt.

View Footnotes

Published 2014-06-28

  1. Richard Elliot Friedman, Who Wrote the Bible? (New York: Perennial Library, 1989).

  2. Baruch A. Levine, Numbers 21-36: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. (New York: Doubleday, 2000), 207–208.

  3. How is the divine name El being used in the Balaam orations? Is it an epithet of YHWH, used as a common noun in the sense of “deity, god,” or is it a proper noun, referring to the West Semitic deity El? The virtually unique parallelism of ‘el/YHWH in the first poem (Num 23:8) suggests that usage of the name ‘el in the Balaam poems is discrete, not epithetical, and El, not YHWH, is the deity empowering Balaam, whose words Balaam heard and whose visions he beholds. It is powerful El who brought Israel out of Egypt (Levine, Numbers, 42).

  4. Some examples:

    Exod. 15:11

    ..מִֽי־כָמֹ֤כָה בָּֽאֵלִם֙ יְ-הוָ֔ה
    Who is like you, Yhwh, among the gods?

    Jer. 7:18

    הַבָּנִים מְלַקְּטִים עֵצִים וְהָאָבוֹת מְבַעֲרִים אֶת־ הָאֵשׁ וְהַנָּשִׁים לָשׁוֹת בָּצֵק לַעֲשׂוֹת כַּוָּנִים לִמְלֶכֶת הַשָּׁמַיִם וְהַסֵּךְ נְסָכִים לֵאלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים
    The children gather sticks, the fathers build the fire, and the mothers knead dough, to make cakes for the Queen of Heaven, and they pour libations to other gods…

    Deuteronomy 6:4

    שְׁמַ֖ע יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל יְ-הוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֵ֖ינוּ יְ-הוָ֥ה׀ אֶחָֽד׃
    Hear, O Israel! Yhwh is our God, Yhwh alone.

    Finally, if one reads Psalm 82 (the “Psalm for Tuesday”) with a modern, critical eye one will see the god of Israel interacting with his fellow divine beings in a heavenly court.

  5. See, for example, Mark S. Smith, The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1990). Smith follows in a long line of scholars who have investigated the Ancient Near Eastern context of Israel’s beliefs and worship systems.

  6. Regarding the convergence of gods in ancient Israel, Levine writes:

    The synthesis of El with YHWH, so prevalent in certain biblical traditions, and the triumph of exclusive Yahwism were yet to be actualized. The overarching regional pantheon was still dominant within the larger framework of Israelite society. In effect, the Balaam orations of Numbers 23–24 are stating that El, head of the regional pantheon, redeemed Israel from Egypt and was now bringing this people to its land. The deities of the regional pantheon, whom Balaam served, and who were headed by El, had commanded him to bless Israel, forbidding him to pronounce curses upon this people who was blessed by them. To put it simply, Balaam’s own chief deity, El, was rendering him powerless! This is why there is no battle of divine powers in the Balaam poems (Levine, Numbers, 43).

    One possible example of this comes from our verse (Numbers 23:21-22) where the god El is presented in parallel structure with the divine name Yhwh:

    יְ-הוָ֤ה אֱלֹהָיו֙ עִמּ֔וֹ
    וּתְרוּעַ֥ת מֶ֖לֶךְ בּֽוֹ׃
    אֵ֖ל מוֹצִיאָ֣ם מִמִּצְרָ֑יִם
    כְּתוֹעֲפֹ֥ת רְאֵ֖ם לֽוֹ׃
    Yhwh, his god, is at his side;
    the battle-cry of the king is in him
    El brought him out of Egypt;
    like the horns of a wild ox does he have!

    This parallelistic structure appears to speak to a community not yet understanding its obligations to the divine as expressive of a singular devotion to one and only one God.

  7. Translation by Jacob Milgrom, Numbers: The Traditional Hebrew Text With the New JPS Translation (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990), 474. Baruch Levine writes about the impact on these inscriptions both for understanding the Book of Numbers as well as reconstructing the “religious points of view” found among ancient Israelites:

    It is probable that the Deir ‘Alla inscriptions speak for, and were composed by Gileadite Israelites who were El worshippers, primarily if not exclusively, since the name of Yhwh never appears in the Deir‘Alla texts. Furthermore, the biblical Balaam poems may well have been composed in Gilead by fellow Israelite contemporaries, who worshipped Yhwh as the national God of Israel, but not exclusively so… (Levine, Numbers, 43).
  8. See Frank M. Cross’s article on El in G. Johannes Botterweck, and Helmer Ringgren, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (trans. John T. Willis; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977), 242–261. There are, of course, biblical parallels to these latter images:

    כִּי־יֶלֶד יֻלַּד־ לָנוּ בֵּן נִתַּן־ לָנוּ וַתְּהִי הַמִּשְׂרָה עַל־ שִׁכְמוֹ וַיִּקְרָא שְׁמוֹ פֶּלֶא יוֹעֵץ אֵל גִּבּוֹר אֲבִיעַד שַׂר־ שָׁלוֹם –
    For a child has been born to us, A son has been given us. And authority has settled on his shoulders. He has been named “The Mighty God/El is planning grace; The Eternal Father, a peaceable ruler” (Isaiah 9:5, an admittedly difficult text);
    הֲלוֹא אָב אֶחָד לְכֻלָּנוּ הֲלוֹא אֵל אֶחָד בְּרָאָנוּ
    “Have we not all one Father? Did not one God/El create us?” (Malachi 2:10).
  9. Uriel Simon, “The Religious Significance of the Peshat,” Tradition 23.2 (1988): 41–63; see also Stephen Garfinkel, “Applied Peshat : Historical-Critical Method and Religious Meaning.” The Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 22 (1993): 19–28; and Robert A. Harris, “Concepts of Scripture in the School of Rashi.” In Jewish Concepts of Scripture: A Comparative Introduction (ed. Benjamin D. Sommer; New York: NYU Press, 2012), 102-22.

  10. It is likely that Maimonides has chosen his opening words to deliberately hint at the personal, most intimate name of God: The opening letters of each word (יסוד היסודות ועמוד החכמות) yield the Divine name, “YHWH.”

  11. Maimonides did not intend the Mishneh Torah for the intellectual elite alone, something he did intend for the Guide for the Perplexed.

  12. See, for example, Neil Gillman, Sacred Fragments: Recovering Theology for the Modern Jew (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990).