Why Did King Hezekiah Celebrate His Inaugural Passover a Month Late?

Upon purifying the Temple in his first year as king, Hezekiah delays the celebration of Passover until the 14th of Iyar, the date of the Torah’s Pesach Sheni, “Second Passover.” A close examination of the story (2 Chr 29–30) demonstrates that this wasn’t a simple application of the Pesach Sheni law, but that Hezekiah was innovating in order to create unity between the northern Israelites and southern Judahites.

APA Style

Click to copy

"Why Did King Hezekiah Celebrate His Inaugural Passover a Month Late?" (n.d.). TheTorah.com. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://www.thetorah.com/article/why-did-king-hezekiah-celebrate-his-inaugural-passover-a-month-late

SBL Style

Click to copy

"Why Did King Hezekiah Celebrate His Inaugural Passover a Month Late?." TheTorah.com. Accessed October 30, 2026. https://www.thetorah.com/article/why-did-king-hezekiah-celebrate-his-inaugural-passover-a-month-late.

Why Did King Hezekiah Celebrate His Inaugural Passover a Month Late?

Hezekiah reopens the temple. 2 Chron. 29: 20-26. T.C. Ducdale. Museon.nl

The Book of Chronicles narrates how, in the first year of his rule, the Judean King Hezekiah (who ascended the throne in 727 B.C.E.) took the unusual step of celebrating Passover a full month later than the prescribed time, on the fourteenth of the second month (Iyar) instead of the fourteenth of the first month (Nisan). This event forms part of an extended narrative in Chronicles dealing with Hezekiah’s cultic activities (2 Chr 29–31) which has no parallel in the Book of Kings:[1]

דברי הימים ל:א וַיִּשְׁלַח יְחִזְקִיָּהוּ עַל כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל וִיהוּדָה וְגַם אִגְּרוֹת כָּתַב עַל אֶפְרַיִם וּמְנַשֶּׁה לָבוֹא לְבֵית יְ־הוָה בִּירוּשָׁלָ‍ִם לַעֲשׂוֹת פֶּסַח לַי־הוָה אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. ל:ב וַיִּוָּעַץ הַמֶּלֶךְ וְשָׂרָיו וְכָל הַקָּהָל בִּירוּשָׁלָ‍ִם לַעֲשׂוֹת הַפֶּסַח בַּחֹדֶשׁ הַשֵּׁנִי….
2 Chr 30:1 Hezekiah sent word to all Israel and Judah; he also wrote letters to Ephraim and Manasseh to come to the house of YHWH in Jerusalem to keep the Passover for YHWH God of Israel. 30:2 The king and his officers and the congregation in Jerusalem had agreed to keep the Passover in the second month….
ל:יג וַיֵּאָסְפוּ יְרוּשָׁלַ‍ִם עַם רָב לַעֲשׂוֹת אֶת חַג הַמַּצּוֹת בַּחֹדֶשׁ הַשֵּׁנִי קָהָל לָרֹב מְאֹד… ל:טו וַיִּשְׁחֲטוּ הַפֶּסַח בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר לַחֹדֶשׁ הַשֵּׁנִי…
30:13 A great crowd assembled at Jerusalem to keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread in the second month, a very great congregation….30:15 They slaughtered the paschal sacrifice on the fourteenth of the second month….

Upon assuming the throne following a long period of contamination and neglect during the reign of his wicked father, Ahaz, Hezekiah’s first act was to purify the Temple and restore its regular sacrificial rituals.[2] The process, however, only ended after the 14th of Nisan:

דברי הימים ב כט:יז וַיָּחֵלּוּ בְּאֶחָד לַחֹדֶשׁ הָרִאשׁוֹן לְקַדֵּשׁ וּבְיוֹם שְׁמוֹנָה לַחֹדֶשׁ בָּאוּ לְאוּלָם יְ־הוָה וַיְקַדְּשׁוּ אֶת בֵּית יְ־הוָה לְיָמִים שְׁמוֹנָה וּבְיוֹם שִׁשָּׁה עָשָׂר לַחֹדֶשׁ הָרִאשׁוֹן כִּלּוּ.
2 Chr 29:17 They began the sanctification on the first day of the first month; on the eighth day of the month, they reached the porch of YHWH. They sanctified the house of YHWH for eight days, and on the sixteenth day of the first month they finished.

In other words, according to this account, because the priestly and Levitical staff necessary to perform the Pesach rituals properly and the Temple itself were not adequately purified, the Judeans were unable to celebrate Pesach at its proper time and postponed it by a month.

Echoes of Pesach Sheni (the Delayed Pesach)?

At first glance, it seems Hezekiah is following the law of the delayed Passover in Numbers 9:1–14. After speaking about the first Pesach that the Israelites celebrated in the wilderness, it notes:

במדבר ט:ו וַיְהִי אֲנָשִׁים אֲשֶׁר הָיוּ טְמֵאִים לְנֶפֶשׁ אָדָם וְלֹא יָכְלוּ לַעֲשֹׂת הַפֶּסַח בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא וַיִּקְרְבוּ לִפְנֵי מֹשֶׁה וְלִפְנֵי אַהֲרֹן בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא.
Num 9:6 But there were some men who were unclean by reason of a corpse and they could not keep the passover at that time. Appearing that same day before Moses and Aaron.

The two passages contain several identical phrases. For example, the explanation of the problem that caused the delay are almost identical:

Wilderness Account (Num 9:6)

וְלֹא יָכְלוּ לַעֲשֹׂת הַפֶּסַח בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא
and they could not keep the Pesach at that time

Hezekiah Account (2 Chr 30:3)

כִּי לֹא יָכְלוּ לַעֲשֹׂתוֹ בָּעֵת הַהִיא
for they could not keep it at that time

The Israelites then complain about their lost opportunity to Moses and Aaron, and Moses receives directions from God about celebrating a delayed Pesach:

במדבר ט:י אִישׁ אִישׁ כִּי יִהְיֶה טָמֵא לָנֶפֶשׁ אוֹ בְדֶרֶךְ רְחֹקָה לָכֶם אוֹ לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם וְעָשָׂה פֶסַח לַי־הוָה. ט:יא בַּחֹדֶשׁ הַשֵּׁנִי בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר יוֹם בֵּין הָעַרְבַּיִם יַעֲשׂוּ אֹתוֹ…
Num 9:10-11 When any of you or of your posterity who are defiled by a corpse or on a long journey would offer a paschal sacrifice to YHWH, they shall offer it in the second month, on the fourteenth day of the month at twilight….

The connection between Hezekiah’s Passover and Numbers becomes tighter when we note that Chronicles uses the same reasons for allowing the Pesach to be pushed off—impurity and distance—as God uses in the response to the request in the Numbers account:[3]

דברי הימים ב ל:ג כִּי לֹא יָכְלוּ לַעֲשֹׂתוֹ בָּעֵת הַהִיא כִּי הַכֹּהֲנִים לֹא הִתְקַדְּשׁוּ לְמַדַּי וְהָעָם לֹא נֶאֶסְפוּ לִירוּשָׁלָ‍ִם.
2 Chr 30:3 For they were unable to keep it at that time [i.e., its appointed time], for not enough priests had sanctified themselves (=impurity), nor had the people assembled in Jerusalem (=distance).

Thus, it would seem that Chronicles is presenting us with a story about how, in the first year of Hezekiah’s reign, the people as a whole were forced to celebrate the second Pesach instead of the first.

Is This the Torah’s Pesach Sheni?

Notwithstanding these parallels, it is unclear that the Chronicler was intending to portray Hezekiah’s delayed Passover as an implementation of the Torah’s Pesach Sheni law. The classical rabbis suggested instead that Hezekiah was declaring a leap year by adding a month to the calendar, עיבר ניסן בניסן, “he added another Nisan when it was already Nisan” (m. Pesachim 4:9).[4] Thus, the Judeans were not celebrating Pesach in Iyar but in Second Nisan (or in regular Nisan, with the first Nisan retroactively turned into Second Adar).[5]

Although the rabbinic reading of the text cannot be sustained as peshat, because nothing in the text of Chronicles suggests the declaration of a leap year, a number of contemporary scholars agree that the text is not discussing Pesach Sheni. For instance, Simeon Chavel of the University of Chicago writes:

Hezekiah defers the Passover not on the basis of any law or tradition, but solely and explicitly through human deliberation and consultation capped by his own royal decree.[6]

Perhaps the strongest argument against the story in Chronicles being an implementation of the law in Numbers is that it refrains from explicitly saying that Hezekiah’s decision was done “in accordance with Moses’ Torah” as is his wont elsewhere.[7] Even in the continuation of the story itself, when describing the positions taken up by the priests and Levites during the sacrificial procedure, the Chronicler notes:

דברי הימים ל:טו …וְהַכֹּהֲנִים וְהַלְוִיִּם נִכְלְמוּ וַיִּתְקַדְּשׁוּ וַיָּבִיאוּ עֹלוֹת בֵּית יְ־הוָה. ל:טז וַיַּעַמְדוּ עַל עָמְדָם כְּמִשְׁפָּטָם כְּתוֹרַת מֹשֶׁה אִישׁ הָאֱלֹהִים הַכֹּהֲנִים זֹרְקִים אֶת הַדָּם מִיַּד הַלְוִיִּם.
2 Chr 30:15 …The priests and Levites were ashamed, and they sanctified themselves and brought burnt offerings to the House of YHWH. 30:16 They took their stations,as was their rule according to the Teaching of Moses, man of God. The priests dashed the blood [which they received] from the Levites.

Considering the use of this refrain elsewhere, especially in this same story, the absence of an explicit mention of how Hezekiah was following the Torah would be hard to explain if, indeed, the story was about how Hezekiah was following the Torah’s law of Pesach Sheni.

Other differences between what is described in Chronicles and what is described in Numbers also suggest that the Chronicler did not view Hezekiah’s late observance of the Passover as a Pesach Sheni.

Some Participants Still Impure—Pesach Sheni is designed to give people who are impure on the 14th of Nisan an opportunity to do a make-up paschal sacrifice the next month. Hezekiah, however, actually allows people who are still impure to offer the sacrifice anyway:

דברי הימים ב ל:יז כִּי רַבַּת בַּקָּהָל אֲשֶׁר לֹא הִתְקַדָּשׁוּ וְהַלְוִיִּם עַל שְׁחִיטַת הַפְּסָחִים לְכֹל לֹא טָהוֹר לְהַקְדִּישׁ לַי־הוָה. ל:יח כִּי מַרְבִּית הָעָם רַבַּת מֵאֶפְרַיִם וּמְנַשֶּׁה יִשָּׂשכָר וּזְבֻלוּן לֹא הִטֶּהָרוּ כִּי אָכְלוּ אֶת הַפֶּסַח בְּלֹא כַכָּתוּב כִּי הִתְפַּלֵּל יְחִזְקִיָּהוּ עֲלֵיהֶם לֵאמֹר יְ־הוָה הַטּוֹב יְכַפֵּר בְּעַד.
2 Chr 30:17 Since many in the congregation had not sanctified themselves, the Levites were in charge of slaughtering the paschal sacrifice for everyone who was not clean, so as to consecrate them to the Lord. 30:18 For most of the people – many from Ephraim and Manasseh, Issachar and Zebulun – had not purified themselves, yet they ate the paschal sacrifice in violation of what was written. Hezekiah prayed for them saying, “YHWH the good will provide atonement.”

The underlined phrase makes it clear that the Hezekiah of Chronicles knows the law against impure people eating the paschal sacrifice, but he violates it anyway.[8] In spirit and letter, this is the very opposite of the Pesach Sheni law.

Cancelling the Main Pesach—The law of Pesach Sheni is designed to allow individuals who are impure or far away an opportunity to offer the sacrifice. Numbers 9 never envisioned a situation in which the main Passover observance would be cancelled altogether, and yet this is what Hezekiah does, thus creating an unprecedented situation that is not governed by any Torah law.

Only the Sacrifice, Not the Matzot Festival—The law of Pesach Sheni refers only to the delay of the paschal sacrifice itself, not to the ensuing seven-day festival of unleavened bread.[9] By contrast, Hezekiah’s delayed Passover included both the paschal sacrifice as well as the seven-day festival of Unleavened Bread (2 Chr 30:21).

דברי הימים ב ל:כא וַיַּעֲשׂוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל הַנִּמְצְאִים בִּירוּשָׁלַ‍ִם אֶת חַג הַמַּצּוֹת שִׁבְעַת יָמִים בְּשִׂמְחָה גְדוֹלָה וּמְהַלְלִים לַי־הוָה יוֹם בְּיוֹם הַלְוִיִּם וְהַכֹּהֲנִים בִּכְלֵי עֹז לַי־הוָה.
2 Chr 30:21 The Israelites who were in Jerusalem kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days, with great rejoicing, the Levites and the priests praising YHWH daily with powerful instruments for YHWH.

Was It Justified?

In keeping with the highly idealized portrayal of Hezekiah in the Book of Chronicles (even more so than in the Book of Kings), the Chronicler goes out of his way to present Hezekiah’s move in positive terms; he reports God’s favorable response to Hezekiah’s prayer asking for forgiveness on behalf of those who participated in the festivities in a state of impurity:

דברי הימים ב ל:כ וַיִּשְׁמַע יְ־הוָה אֶל יְחִזְקִיָּהוּ וַיִּרְפָּא אֶת הָעָם.
2 Chr 30:20 YHWH heard Hezekiah and healed the people.[10]

If the Chronicler does not see Hezekiah’s Passover as an implementation of the Torah’s Pesach Sheni law, what then justified Hezekiah’s extraordinary steps in his eyes? Put differently, why does the Chronicler approve of what can at best be called a pseudo Pesach Sheni – ostensibly mimicking the circumstances of the law in Numbers 9 but at the same time diverging from that law in fundamental ways? The answer is connected to the depiction of Hezekiah as a second Solomon.

Hezekiah’s Motivation – Reuniting the Divided People

According to the Bible, shortly after the death of Solomon, the Northern and Transjordanian tribes under Jeroboam seceded from the Davidic Kingdom and formed the polity of Israel. As a consequence, the southern polity (now Judah), which remained under Davidic rule, was much smaller.

The Chronicler viewed the northern Israelite kingdom of the ten tribes as fundamentally rebellious.[11] As stated by King Abijah (grandson of Solomon):

דברי הימים ב יג:ד …שְׁמָעוּנִי יָרָבְעָם וְכָל יִשְׂרָאֵל. יג:ה הֲלֹא לָכֶם לָדַעַת כִּי יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל נָתַן מַמְלָכָה לְדָוִיד עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל לְעוֹלָם לוֹ וּלְבָנָיו בְּרִית מֶלַח. יג:ווַיָּקָם יָרָבְעָם בֶּן נְבָט עֶבֶד שְׁלֹמֹה בֶן דָּוִיד וַיִּמְרֹד עַל אֲדֹנָיו. יג:ז וַיִּקָּבְצוּ עָלָיו אֲנָשִׁים רֵקִים בְּנֵי בְלִיַּעַל וַיִּתְאַמְּצוּ עַל רְחַבְעָם בֶּן שְׁלֹמֹה וּרְחַבְעָם הָיָה נַעַר וְרַךְ לֵבָב וְלֹא הִתְחַזַּק לִפְנֵיהֶם.
2 Chr 13:4 …Listen to me Jeroboam and all Israel. 13:5 Surely you know that YHWH God of Israel gave David kingship over Israel forever, to him and his sons by a covenant of salt.[12]13:6 Jeroboam son of Nebat had been in the service of Solomon son of David, but he rose up and rebelled against his master. 13:7 Riffraff and scoundrels gathered around him and pressed hard upon Rehoboam son of Solomon. Rehoboam was inexperienced and fainthearted and could not stand up to them.[13]

The Chronicler does not offer a systematic review of the history of the northern kingdom. Nevertheless, he had some form of the Book of Kings and thus, he knows that the northern kingdom came to an end in Hezekiah’s time (2 Kgs 18:9–10). Thus, the Chronicler seizes upon Hezekiah’s reign by viewing it as the first historical opportunity for the reunification of the people under Davidic rule, and even more importantly, around the Jerusalem Temple.

This is why the Chronicler has Hezekiah making such great efforts to include the inhabitants of the former northern kingdom in the belated Passover celebrations, even presenting it as an opportunity for the northerners to reverse their state of misfortune. Hezekiah states this explicitly in his appeal to the northerners:

דברי הימים ב ל:ז וְאַל תִּהְיוּ כַּאֲבוֹתֵיכֶם וְכַאֲחֵיכֶם אֲשֶׁר מָעֲלוּ בַּי־הוָה אֱלֹהֵי אֲבוֹתֵיהֶם וַיִּתְּנֵם לְשַׁמָּה כַּאֲשֶׁר אַתֶּם רֹאִים. ל:חעַתָּה אַל תַּקְשׁוּ עָרְפְּכֶם כַּאֲבוֹתֵיכֶם תְּנוּ יָד לַי־הוָה וּבֹאוּ לְמִקְדָּשׁוֹ אֲשֶׁר הִקְדִּישׁ לְעוֹלָם וְעִבְדוּ אֶת יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵיכֶם וְיָשֹׁב מִכֶּם חֲרוֹן אַפּוֹ.
2 Chr 30:7 Do not be like your fathers and brothers who trespassed against YHWH God of their fathers and he turned them into a horror as you see.30:8 Now do not be stiff-necked like your fathers; submit yourselves to YHWH and come to his sanctuary which he consecrated forever, and serve YHWH your God so that his anger may turn back from you.

This opportunity for political and cultic reunification of the people also explains why the Chronicler was prepared to make allowances for Hezekiah not following the letter of the law in terms of how he proceeded with and executed the delayed Passover. In this sense, Hezekiah’s delayed Passover is narrated more in the flavor of a הוראת שעה (an exceptional overruling of Torah law dictated by extraordinary circumstances and for the fulfillment of a greater good)[14] than as a literal fulfillment of the Pesach Sheni law.

Using Solomonic Imagery

The clearest indication that the Chronicler viewed Hezekiah’s efforts as both justified and successful comes through the parallels that the Chronicler constructs between Hezekiah’s Passover and Solomon’s dedication of the First Temple (1 Kgs 8).

1. Seven Extra Days

Hezekiah’s observance of the seven-day festival of unleavened bread was followed by an additional seven days of joyous celebration, just as Solomon’s Temple dedication (which corresponded with the seven-day festival of the seventh month – presumably Sukkot) was followed by an additional seven days of celebration.

Hezekiah: 2 Chr 30:23

וַיִּוָּעֲצוּ כָּל הַקָּהָל לַעֲשׂוֹת שִׁבְעַת יָמִים אֲחֵרִים וַיַּעֲשׂוּ שִׁבְעַת יָמִים שִׂמְחָה.
All the congregation resolved to keep seven more days, so they kept seven more days of rejoicing.

Solomon: 1 Kgs 8:65

וַיַּעַשׂ שְׁלֹמֹה בָעֵת הַהִיא אֶת הֶחָג וְכָל יִשְׂרָאֵל עִמּוֹ קָהָל גָּדוֹל מִלְּבוֹא חֲמָת עַד נַחַל מִצְרַיִם לִפְנֵי יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ שִׁבְעַת יָמִים וְשִׁבְעַת יָמִים אַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר יוֹם
So Solomon and all Israel with him—a great assemblage, coming from Lebo-hamath to the Wadi of Egypt—observed the Feast at that time before YHWH our God, seven days and again seven days, fourteen days in all.[15]

2. Huge Amount of Sacrifices

The extraordinary large amount of sacrifices that were brought by Hezekiah and the entire congregation is reminiscent of the huge number of sacrifices that Solomon and the people offered at the temple dedication.

Hezekiah: 2 Chr 30:24

כִּי חִזְקִיָּהוּ מֶלֶךְ יְהוּדָה הֵרִים לַקָּהָל אֶלֶף פָּרִים וְשִׁבְעַת אֲלָפִים צֹאן וְהַשָּׂרִים הֵרִימוּ לַקָּהָל פָּרִים אֶלֶף וְצֹאן עֲשֶׂרֶת אֲלָפִים
King Hezekiah of Judah contributed to the congregation 1000 bulls and 7000 sheep. And the officers contributed to the congregation 1000 bulls and 10000 sheep.

Solomon: 2 Chr 7:4–5

וְהַמֶּלֶךְ וְכָל הָעָם זֹבְחִים זֶבַח לִפְנֵי יְהוָה. וַיִּזְבַּח הַמֶּלֶךְ שְׁלֹמֹה אֶת זֶבַח הַבָּקָר עֶשְׂרִים וּשְׁנַיִם אֶלֶף וְצֹאן מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים אָלֶף
Then the king and all the people offered sacrifices before YHWH. King Solomon offered as sacrifices 22000 oxen and 120000 sheep.

3. Great Joy

The Chronicler explicitly references the time of Solomon in highlighting the great joy that took hold in Jerusalem as a result of Hezekiah’s Passover. The joy of Solomon’s time most likely refers to the aftermath of his Temple dedication.

Hezekiah: 2 Chr 30:26

וַתְּהִי שִׂמְחָה גְדוֹלָה בִּירוּשָׁלָ‍ִם כִּי מִימֵי שְׁלֹמֹה בֶן דָּוִיד מֶלֶךְ יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא כָזֹאת בִּירוּשָׁלָ‍ִם.
There was great rejoicing in Jerusalem, for since the time of King Solomon son of David of Israel nothing like it had happened in Jerusalem.

Solomon: 2 Chr 7:10

… שִׁלַּח אֶת הָעָם לְאָהֳלֵיהֶם שְׂמֵחִים וְטוֹבֵי לֵב עַל הַטּוֹבָה אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה יְ־הוָה לְדָוִיד ולשלמה וּלְיִשְׂרָאֵל עַמּוֹ
… he dismissed the people to their homes, rejoicing and in good spirits over the goodness that YHWH had shown to David and Solomon and his people Israel.

Taken together, these parallels, along with the Chronicler’s explicit reference to Solomon’s time, express the idea that Hezekiah’s Passover was as momentous as the initial dedication of the Temple, inasmuch as it produced a broad-based participation in the Temple cult and a spirit of national unity and joy that had not been seen during the entire period of the divided monarchy. It is no wonder, then, that the Chronicler views Hezekiah and his reign as a highpoint in First Temple history (even more so than Josiah, who is portrayed as the ultimate hero in the Book of Kings).[16]

Hezekiah as a Model for the Chronicler’s Own Quest for National Unity

Various factors point to an early fourth century B.C.E. date for Chronicles.[17] This was a time when there was a growing danger of a split between the Judean community that was centered around the Jerusalem temple on the one hand and the polity based in Samaria on the other hand. Clear echoes of such tensions are present in the Book of Nehemiah that is set against the backdrop of the third quarter of the fifth century B.C.E. (Neh 2:19–20; 3:33–35).

The Chronicler’s positive depiction of Hezekiah’s outreach to the northerners, even at the expense of setting aside strict adherence to Torah law, would reflect the premium that the Chronicler put on communal unity and cooperation as a bulwark for preventing any possible split in the community.[18]

Inspiration for Unity

Sadly, the Chronicler’s ideal vision did not come to pass, as the Samaritan split-off, which was made irrevocable with the establishment of the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim during the time of Alexander the Great,[19] was only the first of many Jewish sects that were to characterize later Second Temple Judaism.[20]

But the Chronicler’s full and enthusiastic support for Hezekiah’s efforts to bring about national unity, even while making accommodations that only had a very tangential parallel in strict Torah law, can serve as an inspiration for us now. This holds true notwithstanding the fact that over our long history, Hezekiah’s aims sometimes proved utopian rather than realistic.

View Footnotes

Published 2019-05-15

  1. The fact that Chronicles is not dependent on Kings raises the classic question of what other sources, if any, did the Chronicler have at his disposal. For a review of the issue, see Sara Japhet, “The Historical Reliability of Chronicles: The History of the Problem and its Place in Biblical Research,” in her collection of essays From the Rivers of Babylon to the Highlands of Judah: Collected Studies on the Restoration Period (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2006), 117–36.

  2. The Chronicler’s dating of Hezekiah’s cultic reforms and Passover celebration to the very beginning of his reign reflects a literary-theological convention aimed at highlighting the king’s dedication to the cult, and most likely does not preserve the event’s actual chronological setting. See Mordechai Cogan, “The Chronicler’s Use of Chronology as Illuminated by Neo-Assyrian Royal Inscriptions,” in Empirical Models for Biblical Criticism, ed. Jeffrey H. Tigay (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985), 197–209.

  3. This point is noted by Jacob Milgrom, The JPS Torah Commentary: Numbers (Philadelphia: JPS, 1990), 372.

  4. The rabbis actually take Hezekiah to task for this action. The rabbis’ criticism of Hezekiah is evidently reflective of their sensitivity to the challenges against their own authority on calendrical matters that were posed by groups like the Sadducees and the Samaritans.

  5. This is the assumption of the Mishnah, but Bavli Sanhedrin 12a–b records the alternative opinion of Rabbi Shimon ben Yehudah in the name of R. Shimon, that Hezekiah was declaring that Pesach Sheni would be followed that year.

  6. Simeon Chavel, “The Second Passover, Pilgrimage, and the Centralized Cult,” Harvard Theological Review 102 (2009): 1–24 (7).

  7. See, for example, the description of Josiah’s Passover:

    דברים הימים לה:יאוַיִּשְׁחֲטוּ הַפָּסַח וַיִּזְרְקוּ הַכֹּהֲנִים מִיָּדָם וְהַלְוִיִּם מַפְשִׁיטִים. לה:יבוַיָּסִירוּ הָעֹלָה לְתִתָּם לְמִפְלַגּוֹת לְבֵית אָבוֹת לִבְנֵי הָעָם לְהַקְרִיב לַי־הוָהכַּכָּתוּב בְּסֵפֶר מֹשֶׁהוְכֵן לַבָּקָר. לה:יגוַיְבַשְּׁלוּ הַפֶּסַח בָּאֵשׁכַּמִּשְׁפָּט….
    2 Chr 35:11 They slaughtered the paschal sacrifice and the priests [received its blood] from them and dashed it, while the Levites flayed the animals. 35:12 They removed the parts to be burnt, distributing them to divisions of the people by clans, and making the sacrifices to YHWH, as prescribed in the scroll of Moses. They did the same for the cattle. 35:13 They roasted the paschal sacrifice in fire as prescribed….

    The latter verse is a classic example of the Chronicler’s harmonization of conflicting Torah laws—in this case, regarding the appropriate animals to be used for the paschal sacrifice and the manner in which they were to be prepared, whether only sheep and goats and by roasting (thus Exod 12:3–5, 8–9), or with cattle and by cooking as well (thus Deut 16:2, 7). The Chronicler resolves the contradictions by redefining the use of cattle as being for other concomitant sacrifices and by applying a broader definition to the stem בשל. See Isaac Kalimi,The Reshaping of Ancient Israelite History in Chronicles(Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2005), 156–58. For a broad treatment of the references to Moses’ Torah in the book of Chronicles, see Judson R. Shaver, Torah and the Chronicler’s History Work, Brown Judaica Studies 196 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989).

  8. The rabbis (b. Sanhedrin 12a–b) were so troubled by this that they quote 2 Chr 30:18 as if it were referring to the state of general impurity that precipitated Hezekiah’s decision to add an extra month in the first place, as opposed to the plain meaning of the text which refers to the general impurity that still prevailed during the delayed Passover festivities. (I thank the TABS editors for sharing this insight.)

  9. Passages such as Lev 23:5–6 make it clear that these are separate observances, i.e. the Passover sacrifice which is brought on the 14th of Nisan and the contiguous festival of unleavened bread which commences on the 15th of Nisan. Rabbinic tradition recognizes correctly that the observance of Pesach Sheni does not require in its wake an abstention from leavened bread (m. Pesachim 9:3).

  10. As noted by Ralph W. Klein in his 2 Chronicles: A Commentary, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2012), 438–39, God’s healing and forgiveness appear in juxtaposition in 2 Chr 7:14. Thus in our context as well, God’s healing expresses his forgiveness of the people for the sin of eating a sacrifice in a state of impurity – a sin which would generally incur the punishment of excision or karet (Lev 7:20).

  11. See Sara Japhet, The Ideology of the Book of Chronicles and its Place in Biblical Thought (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009), 241–48.

  12. The same term is found in Num 18:19 to describe the covenant between God and the priestly family of Aaron. As Milgrom, Numbers, 154, explains: “Salt was the food preservative par excellence in antiquity … Thus, salt is a symbol of permanence, and a ‘salt covenant,’ therefore, means an unbreakable covenant.”

  13. Of course, this description of events stands in tension with the view of the Book of Kings (1 Kgs 12:15) that is quoted by the Chronicler himself (2 Chr 10:15), according to which Rehoboam’s unreasonableness toward the justified demands of the northern tribes to reduce Solomon’s labor policies was guided by Providence, so as to bring about the fulfillment of the prophet Ahijah’s oracle. Ahijah had promised Jeroboam that God would wrest the ten tribes from Solomon due to his apostasy and hand over the rule of the northern kingdom to Jeroboam (1 Kgs 11:29–39).

  14. On the use of the term, see my discussion in “Was Elijah Permitted to Make an Offering on Mount Carmel?,”TheTorah.com (2019).

  15. The corresponding passage in Chronicles (2 Chr 7:8–9) also speaks of fourteen (actually fifteen) days of rejoicing, opening with the seven-day temple dedication, continuing with the seven-day (Sukkot) festival, and culminating with the additional day of Shemini Atzeret (as prescribed by the Torah’s priestly sources in Lev 23:33–36 and Num 29:12, 35).

  16. See Raymond B. Dillard, 2 Chronicles, Word Biblical Commentary (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1987), 227–29.

  17. See Isaac Kalimi, An Ancient Israelite Historian: Studies in the Chronicler, His Time, Place and Writing, Studia Semitica Neerlandica 46 (Assen: Royal Van Gorcum, 2005), 41–65.

  18. My own position, following Chronicles scholars Hugh Williamson and Sara Japhet, is that Chronicles represents an attempt at achieving a national consensus: David A. Glatt-Gilad, “Chronicles as Consensus Literature,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles?, ed. Ehud Ben Zvi and Diana Edelman (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2011), 67–75. As such, I reject the notion popularized by the mid-twentieth century German scholar Martin Noth that Chronicles represents an anti-Samaritan polemic.

  19. See Frank Moore Cross, s.v. “שמרנים” [Samaritans] in אנציקלופדיה מקראית [Encyclopaedia Biblica] (Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 1982), 8:167– 71.

  20. According to the Mishnah (Rosh Hashanah 2:2), the Samaritans tried to interfere with the smooth running of the rabbinic calendar by impeding the system for informing distant communities about the Sanhedrin’s proclamation of the new moon:

    בראשונה היו משיאין משואות משקלקלו הכותים התקינו שיהו שלוחין יוצאין:
    Before [i.e. in former times] they used to kindle flares, but after the evil doings of the Samaritans, they enacted that messengers should go forth.

    This is a sad postscript to the story of Hezekiah’s Passover, as some of these Samaritans were possibly descendants of the same people that Hezekiah tried so valiantly to attract to the Jerusalem temple by delaying the Passover.