After the Golden Calf, Is the Covenant Renewed with a Ritual Decalogue?

YHWH instructs Moses to carve a second set of tablets and come up the mountain (Exodus 34). YHWH then presents a set of laws, including: Don’t intermarry with the Canaanites; don’t make idols; and do observe Matzot, Shabbat, Shavuot, Ingathering, and Passover. What is the nature of this collection of laws?

APA Style

Click to copy

"After the Golden Calf, Is the Covenant Renewed with a Ritual Decalogue?" (n.d.). TheTorah.com. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://www.thetorah.com/article/after-the-golden-calf-is-the-covenant-renewed-with-a-ritual-decalogue

SBL Style

Click to copy

"After the Golden Calf, Is the Covenant Renewed with a Ritual Decalogue?." TheTorah.com. Accessed October 30, 2026. https://www.thetorah.com/article/after-the-golden-calf-is-the-covenant-renewed-with-a-ritual-decalogue.

After the Golden Calf, Is the Covenant Renewed with a Ritual Decalogue?

Moses breaking the tablets of the law; Israelites worshiping the golden calf. f.262v-263r, Bible illustration, 1445. NYPL

After Moses destroys the first set of tablets in anger over the Golden Calf incident (Exod 32), YHWH instructs Moses to ascend Mount Sinai again with a new set of tablets upon which YHWH will reinscribe the laws:

שמות לד:א וַיֹּאמֶר יְ־הוָה אֶל מֹשֶׁה פְּסָל־לְךָ שְׁנֵי לֻחֹת אֲבָנִים כָּרִאשֹׁנִים וְכָתַבְתִּי עַל הַלֻּחֹת אֶת הַדְּבָרִים אֲשֶׁר הָיוּ עַל הַלֻּחֹת הָרִאשֹׁנִים אֲשֶׁר שִׁבַּרְתָּ. לד:ב וֶהְיֵה נָכוֹן לַבֹּקֶר וְעָלִיתָ בַבֹּקֶר אֶל הַר סִינַי וְנִצַּבְתָּ לִי שָׁם עַל רֹאשׁ הָהָר.
Exod 34:1 YHWH said to Moses, “Cut two tablets of stone like the former ones, and I will write on the tablets the words that were on the former tablets, which you broke. 34:2 Be ready in the morning and come up in the morning to Mount Sinai and present yourself there to me on the top of the mountain.[1]

Moses goes up the mountain with the tablets (vv. 3–4), and YHWH descends and reveals to him the 13 attributes (vv. 5–7). Moses then asks for forgiveness for Israel (vv. 8–9) and YHWH responds by declaring (seemingly for the first time)[2] that He will make a covenant with Israel:

שמות לד:י וַיֹּאמֶר הִנֵּה אָנֹכִי כֹּרֵת בְּרִית נֶגֶד כָּל עַמְּךָ אֶעֱשֶׂה נִפְלָאֹת אֲשֶׁר לֹא נִבְרְאוּ בְכָל הָאָרֶץ וּבְכָל הַגּוֹיִם וְרָאָה כָל הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה בְקִרְבּוֹ אֶת מַעֲשֵׂה יְ־הוָה כִּי נוֹרָא הוּא אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי עֹשֶׂה עִמָּךְ.
Exod 34:10 He said, “I hereby make a covenant. Before all your people I will perform marvels, such as have not been done in all the earth or in any nation, and all the people among whom you live shall see the work of YHWH, for it is an awesome thing that I will do with you.”

At this point, YHWH delivers a set of laws focusing on separating from the Canaanites and a festival and ritual calendar (vv. 11–26; more on this later). YHWH then commands Moses to write these laws down as the words of the covenant:

שמות לד:כז וַיֹּאמֶר יְ־הוָה אֶל מֹשֶׁה כְּתָב־לְךָ אֶת הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה כִּי עַל פִּי הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה כָּרַתִּי אִתְּךָ בְּרִית וְאֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל.
Exod 34:27 YHWH said to Moses, “Write these words, for in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.”

The passage ends with a statement identifying these laws as עֲשֶׂרֶת הַדְּבָרִים, “the ten commandments/statements” or Decalogue:[3]

‏שׁמות לד:כח וַיְהִי שָׁם עִם יְ־הוָה אַרְבָּעִים יוֹם וְאַרְבָּעִים לַיְלָה לֶחֶם לֹא אָכַל וּמַיִם לֹא שָׁתָה וַיִּכְתֹּב עַל הַלֻּחֹת אֵת דִּבְרֵי הַבְּרִית עֲשֶׂרֶת הַדְּבָרִים.
Exod 34:28 He was there with YHWH forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.

Although the narrative describes itself as a covenant renewal, the laws that YHWH gives Moses are not those presented in the first covenant. Source critical scholars suggest that the core of Exodus 34 was originally an independent covenant ceremony that was edited into its current position, with the tablets presented as replacements of those destroyed in the Golden Calf story.

The Two Decalogues

Julius Wellhausen (1844–1918) suggested that there were originally two Decalogues, each serving as the law text for an account of the theophany:

J’s Ritual (or Cultic) Decalogue, given this name by scholars because it addresses issues of cultic requirements and rituals.[4]

E’s Ethical Decalogue, which begins with exclusive worship of YHWH, but focuses primarily on issues of moral and ethical behavior.[5]

When J and E were edited together, J’s theophany was integrated with E’s (in Exod 19),[6] but its Ritual Decalogue was shifted and edited to fit its new setting as a covenant renewal ceremony (Exod 34), leaving E’s Ethical Decalogue in the Sinai theophany.[7] Attributing Exodus 34 to J solves the documentary problem of J’s missing legal collection, making it consistent with the other documentary sources.

A close reading of Exodus 34, however, shows that it includes several parallels to the Covenant Collection (Exod 21–23), and post-Deuteronomic additions and adjustments, as a verse-by-verse review will demonstrate.

The Ritual Decalogue, Verse-by-Verse

Canaanites—YHWH introduces the laws with a promise to remove the natives from the land:

שמות לד:יא שְׁמָר־לְךָ אֵת אֲשֶׁר אָנֹכִי מְצַוְּךָ הַיּוֹם הִנְנִי גֹרֵשׁ מִפָּנֶיךָ אֶת הָאֱמֹרִי וְהַכְּנַעֲנִי וְהַחִתִּי וְהַפְּרִזִּי וְהַחִוִּי וְהַיְבוּסִי.
Exod 34:11 Observe what I command you today. See, I will drive out before you the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites.

If YHWH is removing the inhabitants, why then does the next verse—the first law—warn Israel not to make a covenant with the Canaanites?

שמות לד:יב הִשָּׁמֶר לְךָ פֶּן תִּכְרֹת בְּרִית לְיוֹשֵׁב הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה בָּא עָלֶיהָ פֶּן יִהְיֶה לְמוֹקֵשׁ בְּקִרְבֶּךָ.
Exod 34:12 Take care not to make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land to which you are going, or it will become a snare among you.[8]

As scholars have long noted, early sources assume that the land is filled with natives, while later, Deuteronomistic sources present Joshua as removing them all.[9] this suggests that the opening verse is a Deuteronomistic expansion,[10] as is the next verse:

שמות לד:יג כִּי אֶת מִזְבְּחֹתָם תִּתֹּצוּן וְאֶת מַצֵּבֹתָם תְּשַׁבֵּרוּן וְאֶת אֲשֵׁרָיו תִּכְרֹתוּן.
Exod 34:13 Rather, you shall tear down their altars, break their pillars, and cut down their sacred poles.

The law may draw on Deuteronomy 7, as it presents the command to destroy the Canaanite altars, pillars, and sacred posts in the same order:[11]

דברים ז:ה כִּי אִם כֹּה תַעֲשׂוּ לָהֶם מִזְבְּחֹתֵיהֶם תִּתֹּצוּ וּמַצֵּבֹתָם תְּשַׁבֵּרוּ וַאֲשֵׁירֵהֶם תְּגַדֵּעוּן וּפְסִילֵיהֶם תִּשְׂרְפוּן בָּאֵשׁ.
Deut 7:5 But this is how you must deal with them: break down their altars, smash their pillars, cut down their sacred poles, and burn their idols with fire.

A Jealous God—The next verse explains why the Canaanite cult sites must be destroyed:

שמות לד:יד כִּי לֹא תִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה לְאֵל אַחֵר כִּי יְ־הוָה קַנָּא שְׁמוֹ אֵל קַנָּא הוּא.
Exod 34:14 For you shall worship no other god, because YHWH, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.

Here we have a parallel to the Ethical Decalogue, which also prohibits worship of other gods due to YHWH’s jealousy:

שמות כ:ג לֹא יִהְיֶה לְךָ אֱלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים עַל פָּנָי... כ:ה לֹא תִשְׁתַּחְוֶה לָהֶם וְלֹא תָעָבְדֵם כִּי אָנֹכִי יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֵל קַנָּא...
Exod 20:3 You shall have no other gods before me…. 20:5 You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I YHWH your God am a jealous God.

Wellhausen posited that this prohibition against worshipping other gods was originally the first law of J’s Ritual Decalogue, while the material that precedes it was a later addition.[12]

Intermarriage with Canaanites—The passage then returns to the problem of mixing with Canaanites:

שמות לד:טו פֶּן תִּכְרֹת בְּרִית לְיוֹשֵׁב הָאָרֶץ וְזָנוּ אַחֲרֵי אֱלֹהֵיהֶם וְזָבְחוּ לֵאלֹהֵיהֶם וְקָרָא לְךָ וְאָכַלְתָּ מִזִּבְחוֹ. לד:טז וְלָקַחְתָּ מִבְּנֹתָיו לְבָנֶיךָ וְזָנוּ בְנֹתָיו אַחֲרֵי אֱלֹהֵיהֶן וְהִזְנוּ אֶת בָּנֶיךָ אַחֲרֵי אֱלֹהֵיהֶן.
Exod 34:15 You shall not make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, for when they prostitute themselves to their gods and sacrifice to their gods, someone among them will invite you, and you will eat of the sacrifice, 34:16 and you will take wives from among their daughters for your sons, and their daughters who prostitute themselves to their gods will make your sons also prostitute themselves to their gods.

These verses again may draw on language and themes in Deuteronomy 7:

דברים ז:ג וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם בִּתְּךָ לֹא תִתֵּן לִבְנוֹ וּבִתּוֹ לֹא תִקַּח לִבְנֶךָ. ז:ד כִּי יָסִיר אֶת בִּנְךָ מֵאַחֲרַי וְעָבְדוּ אֱלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים.
Deut 7:3 Do not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons, 7:4 for that would turn away your children from following me, to serve other gods.

Rejection of idols—Next the laws turn to prohibition of making idols:

שמות לד:יז אֱלֹהֵי מַסֵּכָה לֹא תַעֲשֶׂה לָּךְ.
Exod 34:17 You shall not make cast idols.

This is a second parallel to the Ethical Decalogue:

שמות כ:ד לֹא תַעֲשֶׂה לְךָ פֶסֶל וְכָל תְּמוּנָה אֲשֶׁר בַּשָּׁמַיִם מִמַּעַל וַאֲשֶׁר בָּאָרֶץ מִתַָּחַת וַאֲשֶׁר בַּמַּיִם מִתַּחַת לָאָרֶץ.
Exod 20:4 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above or that is on the earth beneath or that is in the water under the earth.

This prohibition against making idols connects thematically with the prohibition against worship other gods (v. 14), leading Wellhausen to suggest that this was the second law of the original Ritual Decalogue. Thus, only verses 14 and 17 in this section of chapter are attributed to J.[13] The remaining material (vv. 11–13 and 15–16) is generally regarded as postdeuteronomic expansions.[14]

The Ritual Decalogue’s Festival Calendar

The rest of the Ritual Decalogue deals with the Israelite festival calendar and other ritual requirements. These laws are very close to the festival calendar and ritual laws found in the Covenant Collection (Exod 21–23), but the Ritual Decalogue also includes expansions or deviations that connect its laws to other biblical legal compositions.[15]

Matzot—The first festival is Matzot (Unleavened Bread), which was originally unconnected to Passover:

שמות לד:יח אֶת חַג הַמַּצּוֹת תִּשְׁמֹר שִׁבְעַת יָמִים תֹּאכַל מַצּוֹת אֲשֶׁר צִוִּיתִךָ לְמוֹעֵד חֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב כִּי בְּחֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב יָצָאתָ מִמִּצְרָיִם.
Exod 34:18 You shall keep the Festival of Unleavened Bread. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, as I commanded you, at the time appointed in the month of Abib, for in the month of Abib you came out from Egypt.

This law is nearly identical to the Matzot law in the Covenant Collection, with only slight variation in the phrasing about the exodus from Egypt:[16]

שמות כג:טו אֶת חַג הַמַּצּוֹת תִּשְׁמֹר שִׁבְעַת יָמִים תֹּאכַל מַצּוֹת כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוִּיתִךָ לְמוֹעֵד חֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב כִּי בוֹ יָצָאתָ מִמִּצְרָיִם וְלֹא יֵרָאוּ פָנַי רֵיקָם.
Exod 23:15 You shall observe the Festival of Unleavened Bread; as I commanded you, you shall eat unleavened bread for seven days at the appointed time in the month of Abib, for in it you came out of Egypt. No one shall appear before me empty-handed.

The command not to appear empty-handed appears later in the Ritual Decalogue, after its law of the firstborn in the next two verses.

Firstborn—All firstborn animals and children be given to God:

שמות לד:יט כָּל פֶּטֶר רֶחֶם לִי וְכָל מִקְנְךָ תִּזָּכָר פֶּטֶר שׁוֹר וָשֶׂה. לד:כ וּפֶטֶר חֲמוֹר תִּפְדֶּה בְשֶׂה וְאִם לֹא תִפְדֶּה וַעֲרַפְתּוֹ כֹּל בְּכוֹר בָּנֶיךָ תִּפְדֶּה וְלֹא יֵרָאוּ פָנַי רֵיקָם.
Exod 34:19 All that first opens the womb is mine, all your male livestock, the firstborn of cow and sheep. 34:20 The firstborn of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb, or if you will not redeem it you shall break its neck. All the firstborn of your sons you shall redeem. No one shall appear before me empty-handed.

The requirement to offer firstborn animals does not appear in the Covenant Collection.[17] Scholars have argued that Exodus 34:19 either drew on, or was a source for, the firstborn law in Exodus 13:[18]

שׁמות יג:יב וְהַעֲבַרְתָּ כָל פֶּטֶר רֶחֶם לַי־הוָֹה וְכָל פֶּטֶר שֶׁגֶר בְּהֵמָה אֲשֶׁר יִהְיֶה לְךָ הַזְּכָרִים לַי־הוָה. יג:יג וְכָל פֶּטֶר חֲמֹר תִּפְדֶּה בְשֶׂה וְאִם לֹא תִפְדֶּה וַעֲרַפְתּוֹ וְכֹל בְּכוֹר אָדָם בְּבָנֶיךָ תִּפְדֶּה.
Exod 13:12 You shall set apart to YHWH all that first opens the womb. All the firstborn offspring of your livestock that are males shall be YHWH’s. 13:13 But every firstborn donkey you shall redeem with a sheep; if you do not redeem it, you must break its neck. Every firstborn male among your children you shall redeem.[19]

Shabbat—The seventh-day rest law is presented as part of the Ritual Decalogue’s festival calendar, implying that it is a festival day and emphasizing its importance, even in the face of economic pressure:

שׁמות לד:כא שֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים תַּעֲבֹד וּבַיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי תִּשְׁבֹּת בֶּחָרִישׁ וּבַקָּצִיר תִּשְׁבֹּת.
Exod 34:21 Six days you shall work, but on the seventh day you shall rest; even in plowing time and in harvest time you shall rest.

This requirement to abstain from work on the seventh day aligns with Priestly law, which sees Shabbat as a festival and depicts Sabbath observance as representative of the covenant with YHWH.[20]

In contrast, in the Covenant Collection, the seventh-day rest law appears as an independent requirement, not part of the festival calendar, and it emphasizes concern for human and animal welfare as its motive:

‏שׁמות כג:יב שֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים תַּעֲשֶׂה מַעֲשֶׂיךָ וּבַיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי תִּשְׁבֹּת לְמַעַן יָנוּחַ שׁוֹרְךָ וַחֲמֹרֶךָ וְיִנָּפֵשׁ בֶּן אֲמָתְךָ וְהַגֵּר.
Exod 23:12 Six days you shall do your work, but on the seventh day you shall rest so that your ox and your donkey may have relief and your homeborn slave and the resident alien may be refreshed.

Shavuot and Ingathering—In the Covenant Collection, the second festival is חַג הַקָּצִיר, “the Festival of Harvest,” and it occurs at the beginning of the harvest period:

שׁמות כג:טז וְחַג הַקָּצִיר בִּכּוּרֵי מַעֲשֶׂיךָ אֲשֶׁר תִּזְרַע בַּשָּׂדֶה וְחַג הָאָסִף בְּצֵאת הַשָּׁנָה בְּאָסְפְּךָ אֶת מַעֲשֶׂיךָ מִן הַשָּׂדֶה.
Exod 23:16 You shall observe the Festival of Harvest, of the first fruits of your labor, of what you sow in the field. You shall observe the Festival of Ingathering at the end of the year, when you gather in from the field the fruit of your labor.

In contrast, the Ritual Decalogue calls the second festival חַג שָׁבֻעֹת, “the Festival of Weeks,” aligning with the festival calendars in Deuteronomy (16:9–10) and Leviticus (23:15–16), which situate this festival seven weeks (or fifty days) after the harvest begins:[21]

שׁמות לד:כב וְחַג שָׁבֻעֹת תַּעֲשֶׂה לְךָ בִּכּוּרֵי קְצִיר חִטִּים וְחַג הָאָסִיף תְּקוּפַת הַשָּׁנָה.
Exod 34:22 You shall observe the Festival of Weeks, the first fruits of the wheat harvest, and the Festival of Ingathering at the turn of the year.

As for the time of Ingathering, it is possible that Exodus 34’s use of “turn” of the year, rather than the Covenant Collection’s “end” of the year, reflects the change from an ancient calendar beginning in autumn to a postexilic calendar beginning in spring.[22]

Pilgrimage—Like the Covenant Collection,[23] Exodus 34 follows Ingathering with a requirement to observe the three pilgrimage festivals:

שׁמות לד:כג שָׁלֹשׁ פְּעָמִים בַּשָּׁנָה יֵרָאֶה כָּל זְכוּרְךָ אֶת פְּנֵי הָאָדֹן יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.
Exod 34:23 Three times in the year all your males shall appear before the Lord YHWH, the God of Israel.

The next verse, however, has no parallel in the Covenant Collection:

שמות לד:כד כִּי אוֹרִישׁ גּוֹיִם מִפָּנֶיךָ וְהִרְחַבְתִּי אֶת גְּבוּלֶךָ וְלֹא יַחְמֹד אִישׁ אֶת אַרְצְךָ בַּעֲלֹתְךָ לֵרָאוֹת אֶת פְּנֵי יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ שָׁלֹשׁ פְּעָמִים בַּשָּׁנָה.
Exod 34:24 For I will cast out nations before you and enlarge your borders; no one shall covet your land when you go up to appear before YHWH your God three times in the year.[24]

YHWH’s reassurance that the people need not fear outside invaders when they must leave their homes to observe pilgrimage festivals suggests that they are traveling not to a local cult site, but to a more distant centralized site. Since the prohibition of local cult sites is an innovation introduced in Deuteronomy, verse 24 must be post-deuteronomic.[25]

Paschal Offering—The Covenant Collection follows its festival calendar with a general law about festival offerings:

שמות כג:יח לֹא תִזְבַּח עַל חָמֵץ דַּם זִבְחִי וְלֹא יָלִין חֵלֶב חַגִּי עַד בֹּקֶר.
Exod 23:18 You shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with anything leavened or let the fat of my festival remain until the morning.

In the Ritual Decalogue, this law has been transformed into a law about the paschal offering:

שמות לד:כה לֹא תִשְׁחַט עַל חָמֵץ דַּם זִבְחִי וְלֹא יָלִין לַבֹּקֶר זֶבַח חַג הַפָּסַח.
Exod 34:25 You shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven, and the sacrifice of the festival of the Passover shall not be left until the morning.

We would expect this law to appear at the beginning of the calendar (with the other spring festivals) rather than the end, further highlighting that the text is following the structure of the Covenant Collection. The addition of the reference to the paschal offering in the Ritual Decalogue may represent an attempt to align its festival calendar with Deuteronomy 16’s combination of Matzot and Passover, which effectively presents the paschal offering as the festival offering for Matzot.[26]

Firstfruits and Animals—The final law of the Ritual Decalogue, dealing with the requirement to bring firstfruits and animals to the altar, is identical to that of the Covenant Collection:

שמות לד:כו [=כג:יט] רֵאשִׁית בִּכּוּרֵי אַדְמָתְךָ תָּבִיא בֵּית יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ לֹא תְבַשֵּׁל גְּדִי בַּחֲלֵב אִמּוֹ.
Exod 34:26 [=23:19] The best of the first fruits of your ground you shall bring to the house of YHWH your God. You shall not allow a kid to grow fat on its mother’s milk.[27]

The fact that the Covenant Collection and the Ritual Decalogue end with exactly the same laws hardly seems coincidental.

The sheer volume of updates to the laws of the Covenant Collection, the post-deuteronomic expansions, and the consistency with which the festival and ritual laws in Exodus 34 transform Covenant Collection laws to align with later legal collections have led to a reevaluation of the traditional source critical view. Many contemporary scholars now reject Wellhausen’s claims that Exodus 34 contains an ancient Ritual Decalogue with later expansions and argue instead that it, as a whole, represents a late compilation that draws on earlier laws.[28]

Forging a Postexilic Israelite Identity

The laws in Exodus 34 serve their current narrative context well—responding to the sins in the Golden Calf story of worshipping an idol and celebrating an unsanctioned festival before it.[29] Whether Exodus 34 was composed to conclude the Golden Calf story, or whether it was an an originally independent narrative that was subsequently incorporated into that story, the final form of the laws and the covenant also fit well in a postexilic context.

The prohibition against intermarriage with non-Israelites and the concern to ensure proper observance of the public cult parallel the concerns of Israelites who returned to Judah in the Persian Period, as they sought to define themselves as a community and distinguish themselves from those they considered outsiders.[30]

Exodus 34 contributed to that process of identity formation by offering a particular vision of Israel—of the ancestors of those who had gone into exile and, by extension, of their descendants who had returned or would return from exile. The text establishes the Israelites’ claim to the land that was given to them by YHWH, and it obligates them to recommit themselves regularly and publicly to their covenant with YHWH through the proper observance of Shabbat and the annual cultic festivals, presumably to ensure that this time, YHWH would allow the Israelites to keep possession of the land.

Appendix

Is the Ritual Decalogue a Decalogue?

Exodus 34 defies simple division into ten laws.[31] To identify the Decalogue form in the text requires viewing significant portions of the text as subsequent expansions. Wellhausen’s list, which includes only the following laws, is one such attempt:

  1. Prohibition against worshipping gods other than YHWH (v. 14a);
  2. Prohibition against molten idols (v. 17);
  3. Festival of Unleavened Bread (v. 18a);
  4. First issue of the womb is YHWHs (v. 19a);
  5. Festival of Weeks (v. 22a);
  6. Festival of Ingathering (v. 22b);
  7. Prohibition against offering sacrifices with anything leavened (v. 25a);
  8. Requirement not to leave Passover sacrifice overnight (v. 25b);
  9. First fruits shall be brought to YHWH’s house (26a); and
  10. Prohibition against cooking a kid in its mother’s milk (26b).

He also considered the commands to cease work on the seventh day (v. 21) and for all Israelite males to appear before YHWH three times per year (v. 23) to be later additions.[32]

This solution is not definitive; at least thirty-six different proposals have been offered for finding only ten laws here.[33] The difficulty has led some scholars to view the reference to עֲשֶׂרֶת הַדְּבָרִים (v. 28) as a later addition to the text, perhaps intended to reinforce the idea that the covenant with YHWH is based on the Decalogue.[34]

View Footnotes

Published 2024-03-07

  1. Biblical translations follow the NRSVue, with modifications.

  2. The verse makes no mention of this being a renewal of the previous covenant. In addition, the presentative adverb הִנֵּה (in the opening phrase) often introduces something new. See Paul L. Joüon and Takamitsu Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, 2nd ed., repr. with corr. of 2006 (Rome: Editrice Pontifico Instituto Biblico, 2009), §105d.

  3. “Ten statements” may be closest to the intended sense of the Hebrew עֲשֶׂרֶת הַדְּבָרִים. See Marc Zvi Brettler and Jed Wyrick, “The Decalogue: Ten Commandments or Ten Statements?” TheTorah (2023). The phrase עֲשֶׂרֶת הַדְּבָרִים first appears in Exodus in reference to the laws of chapter 34, which suggests that these laws, not those of Exodus 20, constitute the Decalogue. References to עֲשֶׂרֶת הַדְּבָרִים in Deuteronomy’s retelling of the theophany at Sinai/Horeb, however (4:13, 10:4), seem to understand the laws spoken by YHWH as the better-known Decalogue of Deuteronomy 5 (= Exodus 20).

  4. On identifying a Decalogue among the laws of Exodus 34:11–26, see the appendix, below.

  5. Part of the original rationale for the early dating of the J source and its Ritual Decalogue was ideological, based on the erroneous notion that ancient Israelite religion initially focused on cultic regulations, only later developing a concern for ethical principles (Shimon Gesundheit, Three Times a Year: Studies on Festival Legislation in the Pentateuch, FAT 82 [Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012], 12–13 n. 3).

  6. See Baruch J. Schwartz, “What Really Happened at Mount Sinai?” TheTorah (2013).

  7. Julius Wellhausen, Die Composition des Hexateuchs und der historischen Bücher des Alten Testaments, 4th ed. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1963), 334. Wellhausen’s theory builds on a suggestion made in an essay anonymously written by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832). See Bernard M. Levinson, “Goethe’s Analysis of Exodus 34 and Its Influence on Wellhausen: The Propfung of the Documentary Hypothesis,” ZAW 114 (2002): 212–223.

  8. Both the Covenant Collection and Deuteronomy also warn of interactions with the Canaanites being a snare to the Israelites:

    שמות כג:לב לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם וְלֵאלֹהֵיהֶם בְּרִית. כג:לג לֹא יֵשְׁבוּ בְּאַרְצְךָ פֶּן יַחֲטִיאוּ אֹתְךָ לִי כִּי תַעֲבֹד אֶת אֱלֹהֵיהֶם כִּי יִהְיֶה לְךָ לְמוֹקֵשׁ.
    Eoxd 23:32 You shall make no covenant with them and their gods. 23:33 They shall not live in your land, lest they make you sin against me, for if you serve their gods, it will surely be a snare to you.
    דברים ז:טז וְאָכַלְתָּ אֶת כָּל הָעַמִּים אֲשֶׁר יְ־הוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ לֹא תָחֹס עֵינְךָ עֲלֵיהֶם וְלֹא תַעֲבֹד אֶת אֱלֹהֵיהֶם כִּי מוֹקֵשׁ הוּא לָךְ.
    Deut 7:16 You shall devour all the peoples that YHWH your God is giving over to you, showing them no pity; you shall not serve their gods, for that would be a snare to you.
  9. See Mordechai Cogan, “Israel’s Incomplete Conquest of Canaan,” TheTorah (2022).

  10. In support of this is the resumptive repetition (Wiederaufnahme) in the opening of both verses, שְׁמָר לְךָ “observe” (v. 11) and הִשָּׁמֶר לְךָ “take care” (v. 12). See Zev Farber, “The Resumptive Repetition (Wiederaufnahme),” TheTorah (2013). The Canaanite laws prohibiting covenants and requiring destruction of their cult sites also parallel themes found in the narrative framing of the Covenant Collection:

    שמות כג:כג כִּי יֵלֵךְ מַלְאָכִי לְפָנֶיךָ וֶהֱבִיאֲךָ אֶל הָאֱמֹרִי וְהַחִתִּי וְהַפְּרִזִּי וְהַכְּנַעֲנִי הַחִוִּי וְהַיְבוּסִי וְהִכְחַדְתִּיו. כג:כד לֹא תִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה לֵאלֹהֵיהֶם וְלֹא תָעָבְדֵם וְלֹא תַעֲשֶׂה כְּמַעֲשֵׂיהֶם כִּי הָרֵס תְּהָרְסֵם וְשַׁבֵּר תְּשַׁבֵּר מַצֵּבֹתֵיהֶם...
    Exod 23:23 When my angel goes in front of you and brings you to the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, and I blot them out, 23:24 you shall not bow down to their gods or serve them or follow their practices, but you shall utterly demolish them and break their pillars in pieces.
  11. H. Louis Ginsberg, The Israelian Heritage of Judaism (New York: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1982), 64.

  12. Wellhausen, Composition des Hexateuchs, 333–334.

  13. Wellhausen, Composition des Hexateuchs, 333–334.

  14. See, e.g., the discussion in Brevard S. Childs, The Book of Exodus: A Critical Theological Commentary, OTL (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1974), 608–609, 613.

  15. On parallels between the festival calendars in Exodus 34 and the Covenant Collection, see the helpful side-by-side presentation of the two passages in Gesundheit, Three Times a Year, 14–16.

  16. In both cases, a one-day festival law has been supplemented by a seven-day festival law, including a connection to the exodus from Egypt. See Zev Farber, “How Eating Matzot Became Part of the Exodus Story,” TheTorah (2018).

  17. What does appear in the Covenant Collection is the requirement to give a firstborn human to God, though it is not connected to the festival calendar:

    שמות כב:כח ...בְּכוֹר בָּנֶיךָ תִּתֶּן לִּי.
    Exod 22:28 …The firstborn of your sons you shall give to me.

    For a discussion of the meaning of this law on its own, see Eve Levavi Feinstein, “Giving Your Firstborn Son to God,” TheTorah (2016).

  18. For example, Gesundheit (Three Times a Year, 178–186) argues that Exodus 34 provided a literary source for the firstborn law in Exodus 13, while Ginsberg (Israelian Heritage, 65) posits that Exodus 34 draws on Exodus 13.

  19. Numbers 18 and Deuteronomy 15 also include the requirement to offer firstborn animals. The connection of the law about redeeming the child to that of firstborn animals and the festival of Matzot is part of a redactional trend that is found elsewhere in the Torah. For a discussion of how and why this redaction was added, see David Frankel, “Laws of the Firstborn: How They Were Connected to the Tenth Plague,” TheTorah (2023).

  20. Gesundheit, Three Times a Year, 21, notes: “This practice of incorporating the mention of the weekly Sabbath in the listing of annual festivals is a uniquely Priestly one, as is immediately apparent from the inclusion of the Sabbath in the Priestly calendars of sacred occasions in Leviticus 23 and Numbers 28–29, at least in their final forms.” Outside the Torah, the postexilic texts of Nehemiah (9:14; 10:31, 33; 13:15–22) and Third Isaiah (56:2, 4, 6; 58:13–14; 66:23–24) also emphasize Sabbath observance, and Third Isaiah (ch. 56) presents it as a marker of adherence to the covenant (Christophe Nihan, “Ethnicity and Identity in Isaiah 56–66,” in Judah and the Judeans in the Achaemenid Period: Negotiating Identity in an International Context, ed. Oded Lipschits, Gary N. Knoppers, and Manfred Oeming [Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2011], 67–104). See also the discussion in Jacob L. Wright, “How and When the Seventh Day Became Shabbat,” TheTorah (2015).

  21. Gesundheit, Three Times a Year, 25–26.

  22. For some discussion of this verse, see Harvey Bock, “Is the Autumn Ingathering Festival at the Beginning, Middle, or End of the Year,” TheTorah (2019).

  23. שמות כג:יז שָׁלֹשׁ פְּעָמִים בַּשָּׁנָה יֵרָאֶה כָּל זְכוּרְךָ אֶל פְּנֵי הָאָדֹן יְ־הוָה.
    Exod 23:17 Three times in the year all your males shall appear before the Lord YHWH.
  24. Since all Israelite males are expected to participate in the festivals, the text most likely envisions invasion by a neighboring kingdom, rather than encroachment by fellow Israelites (William H. C. Propp, Exodus 19–40: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, AB 2A [New York: Doubleday, 2006], 616).

  25. In addition, verse 24 ends with a repetitive resumption (Wiederaufnahme) of the phrase שָׁלֹשׁ פְּעָמִים בַּשָּׁנָה, “three times a year,” from the beginning of verse 23, which may also suggest that it is an insertion. On the Wiederaufnahme often marking secondary elements in texts, see Farber, “The Resumptive Repetition, (Wiederaufnahme).”

  26. Ginsberg, Israelian Heritage, 64–65; and Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 69–71.

  27. For the various understandings/translations of this last phrase, see discussion in Zev Farber, “Prohibition of Meat and Milk: Its Origins in the Text,” TheTorah (2014); Stefan Schorch, “Do Not Cook a Kid Still Suckling Its Mother’s Milk,” TheTorah (2022).

  28. The idea of Exodus 34 as late is not actually new. For early arguments in favor of a postexilic date for the text, see, e.g. Bernardus D. Eerdmans, Alttestamentliche Studien III: Das Buch Exodus (Gießen: Töpelmann, 1910), 77–92; and Robert H. Pfeiffer, “The Oldest Decalogue,” JBL 43 (1924): 294–310. On the debate over the compositional history of Exodus 34 and arguments in favor of viewing the text as a late compilation, see Gesundheit, Three Times a Year, 12–43; and David M. Carr, “Method in Determination of Direction of Dependence: An Empirical Test of Criteria Applied to Exodus 34,11–26 and Its Parallels,” in Gottes Volk am Sinai: Untersuchungen zu Ex 32–34 und Dtn 9–10, ed. Matthias Köckert and Erhard Blum, Veröffentlichungen der wissenschaflichen Gesellschaft für Theologie 18 (Gütersloh: Kaiser, Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2001), 107–140. Though Wellhausen and many traditional source critics argue that J is a preexilic documentary source, other scholars see J as a later, even exilic or early postexilic, composition. (See Thomas B. Dozeman and Konrad Schmid, ed., A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation, SymS 34 [Atlanta: SBL, 2006].) If this is correct, a later date for Exodus 34 would not preclude the possibility that it constitutes J’s Sinai covenant.

  29. Gesundheit, Three Times a Year, 36–37; and David M. Carr, The Formation of the Hebrew Bible: A New Reconstruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 264. Indeed, Lothar Perlitt has argued that the passage was composed together with Exodus 32 during king Josiah’s reign (late 7th century B.C.E.). See Lothar Perlitt, Bundestheologie im Alten Testament, WMANT 36 (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1969), 203–232; and the summary and assessment of Perlitt’s arguments in Ernest W. Nicholson, God and His People: Covenant and Theology in the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986), 139–150.

  30. See especially Ezra 9–10, Nehemiah 13:23–31, and Malachi 2:10–11: All object to intermarriage with other peoples, and, as noted earlier (in n. 19), Nehemiah and Third Isaiah emphasize the importance of Sabbath observance within the Judean community (Nihan, “Ethnicity and Identity in Isaiah 56–66,” 68, 73). In addition: Ezra and Nehemiah repeatedly narrate the reinstitution of festivals and other cultic practices (Dalit Rom-Shiloni, “From Ezekiel to Ezra-Nehemiah: Shifts of Group Identities within Babylonian Exilic Ideology,” in Lipschits, Knoppers, and Oeming, Judah and the Judeans in the Achaemenid Period, 127–151 [at 133 n. 20]); the Priestly texts present a past for Israel that addresses the importance of establishing the sanctuary and sacrificial cult (Konrad Schmid, “Judean Identity and Ecumenicity: The Political Theology of the Priestly Document,” in Lipschits, Knoppers, and Oeming, Judah and the Judeans in the Achaemenid Period, 3–26 [at 4, 8]); and Third Isaiah associates a purified temple and restored sacrificial cult with the coming of a new age (Nihan, “Ethnicity and Identity in Isaiah 56–66,” 96).

  31. Arriving at a count of exactly ten laws for the Decalogue in Exodus 2o (and Deuteronomy 5) is also problematic. For a summary of the most common solutions adopted in the Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish traditions, see the chart by Bernard Levinson in The Jewish Study Bible, ed. Adele Berlin and Marc Zvi Brettler, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 357.

  32. Wellhausen, Composition des Hexateuchs, 333–334.

  33. See the discussion in Shimon Gesundheit, Three Times a Year, 12–13 n. 3.

  34. For example, Childs (Book of Exodus, 608) suggests that the phrase was added to Exodus 34 by a Deuteronomic editor who reasoned that if Deuteronomy understands the Decalogue as the basis of the Sinai/Horeb covenant, then it should also be the basis of the renewed covenant. See also the discussion of whether the phrase is original to the text in David Frankel, “What Did God Write on the Tablets of Stone?” TheTorah (2018).